Epstein Secrets

that the special master would review the actual documents. So reading the transcript, I believe the procedure Your Honor contemplated was that the Farmer Jaffe firm would have input before any of these documents were OUELLETTE & MAULDIN COURT REPORTERS, INC. (305) 358-8875 EFTA00731404 1 2 3 4 5 6

the linchpin of the settlements that Mr. Rothstein was attempting to sell as part of his Ponzi Scheme. So that's a little bit of the background. Fowler White, who is representing the plaintiff, Mr. Epstein, in this case, has made a discovery request seeking documents pertinent to those civil lawsuits.

rivileged materials for over seven years," Fanner Jaffe said in its motion. "The misappropriation of this information has caused irreparable harm." Farmer Jaffe filed its motion in bankruptcy court in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, in the liquidation case of law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler PA, where Edwards h

Farmer Jaffe asked that Epstein bear the costs of copying and organizing the documents but also expressed concern about Epstein and his counsel at Fowler White possibly misappropriating them, Farmer Jaffe recounted. The bankruptcy court granted the copying request with strict instructions that Fowler White

Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & Lehrman PL had said in a March 19 motion that recent developments in ongoing litigation between Epstein and former Farmer Jaffe partner Bradley J. Edwards, who represented several of Epstein's victims, showed that Fowler White retained a copy of confidential documents and th

in ongoing litigation between Epstein and former Farmer Jaffe partner Bradley J. Edwards, who represented several of Epstein's victims, showed that Fowler White retained a copy of confidential documents and that they had been passed along to Epstein's current counsel and to Epstein himself. But in a filing

esponses and Objections to the Notices of Taking Video Deposition Duces Tecum of Epstein [DE 6388]. Apparently, their position is that Edwards (and Farmer Jaffe and the Intervenors) are limited to deposition testimony only and have no ability to test the credibility of that sworn testimony through impeachmen

SET FOR AUGUST 23.24, 2018 Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards"), by and through undersigned counsel and pursuant to the Court's Order to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not Be Held in Contempt and Scheduling Evidentiary Show Cause Hearing, hereby files this Motion to Reschedule Show Cause

ive an opportunity to take discovery (in the form of interrogatories, requests for admission and production, as well as depositions as requested by Farmer Jaffe) on this important subject. 3. A DIRECTION THAT EPSTEIN WRITE A LETTER OF APOLOGY IS APPROPRIATE. The Victims have also requested that Epstein (a

very, to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for Other Appropriate Relief [DE 6353]. INTRODUCTION In their motion, the Victims sought sanctions against Fowler White and Epstein for illegally retaining copies of materials forbidden to be retained or copied by this Court's November 2010 order — including a disk o

e able to identify Richard Fandrey and Michael Fisten. Michael Fisten was an investigator at the Rothstein firm that went with Mr. Edwards to the Farmer Jaffe firm. It says Mr. Fandrey's related to the Gambino family, former bodyguard of Scott Rothstein. There are multiple incident reports and complaint

s produced for attorneys' eyes only, and then privileged documents that were not produced. But documents were delivered to Mr. Epstein's counsel, Fowler White, during that period of time. And -- THE COURT: You're talking about irrespective of what was on the disk? MR. SCAROLA: Well, when you say "irresp