Epstein Secrets

ion, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant: J. Douglas Stewart, Sr., LEAD ATTORNEY, Stewart Melvin & Frost, LLP

4c Watchlists and Blacklists August 9, 2018 Richard Kahn SOURCE: COUNTRY: United States of America LIST NAME: NYSE Arca Enforcement AUTHORITY: New York Stock Exchange PERSONAL INFORMATION COUNTRY: United States of America OTHER INFORMATION LIST INFORMATION: ENTITY TYPE: I DATE OF PUBLICATION: April 20, 2012

oundation in 1996 by Hillis and others, including Stewart Brand, Brian Eno, Esther Dyson, and Mitch Kapor.

es over the last 30 years, including Zagats, Wired, Ambient Devices, Skype and Velti. He sits on several boards, including Motorola (listed on the New York Stock Exchange) and Velti (listed on the London Stock Exchange and the NASDAQ). He is also on the advisory board of TTI/Vanguard. In August 2007, he was appointed

tion of the prosecutor and participate in the investigation." United States v. Barcelo, 628 F. App'x 36, 38 (2d Cir. 2015) (quoting United States v. Stewart, 433 F.3d 273, 298 (2d Cir. 2006)). In considering whether Rule 16 and Brady apply to records in the possession of another government agency, a pr

of information with each other); United States v. Finnerty, 411 F. Supp. 2d 428, 433 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (no joint investigation between Government and New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") where documents sought were "the product of an investigation that was undertaken by the NYSE of its own practices, and there [wa]s no sugg

tion of the prosecutor and participate in the investigation." United States v. Barcelo, 628 F. App'x 36, 38 (2d Cir. 2015) (quoting United States v. Stewart, 433 F.3d 273, 298 (2d Cir. 2006)). In considering whether Rule 16 and Brady apply to records in the possession of another government agency, a pr

of information with each other); United States v. Finnerty, 411 F. Supp. 2d 428, 433 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (no joint investigation between Government and New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") where documents sought were "the product of an investigation that was undertaken by the NYSE of its own practices, and there [wa]s no sugg

tion of the prosecutor and participate in the investigation." United States v. Barcelo, 628 F. App'x 36, 38 (2d Cir. 2015) (quoting United States v. Stewart, 433 F.3d 273, 298 (2d Cir. 2006)). In considering whether Rule 16 and Brady apply to records in the possession of another government agency, a pr

of information with each other); United States v. Finnerty, 411 F. Supp. 2d 428, 433 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (no joint investigation between Government and New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") where documents sought were "the product of an investigation that was undertaken by the NYSE of its own practices, and there [wa]s no sugg

tion of the prosecutor and participate in the investigation." United States v. Barcelo, 628 F. App'x 36, 38 (2d Cir. 2015) (quoting United States v. Stewart, 433 F.3d 273, 298 (2d Cir. 2006)). In considering whether Rule 16 and Brady apply to records in the possession of another government agency, a pr

of information with each other); United States v. Finnerty, 411 F. Supp. 2d 428, 433 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (no joint investigation between Government and New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") where documents sought were "the product of an investigation that was undertaken by the NYSE of its own practices, and there [wa]s no sugg

tion of the prosecutor and participate in the investigation." United States v. Barcelo, 628 F. App'x 36, 38 (2d Cir. 2015) (quoting United States v. Stewart, 433 F.3d 273, 298 (2d Cir. 2006)). In considering whether Rule 16 and Brady apply to records in the possession of another government agency, a pr

of information with each other); United States v. Finnerty, 411 F. Supp. 2d 428, 433 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (no joint investigation between Government and New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") where documents sought were "the product of an investigation that was undertaken by the NYSE of its own practices, and there [wa]s no sugg

Government and SEC); United States v. Finnerty, 411 F. Supp. 2d 428, 433 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (Chin, J.) (no joint investigation between Government and New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE")); United States v. Upton, 856 F. Supp. 727, 749-50 (E.D.N.Y. 1994) (holding that USAO and Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") did not

); United States v. Raniere, No. 18 Cr. 204 (NGG), Dkt. 622 (precluding argument regarding propriety of Government's prosecution), United States v. Stewart, Cr. No. 03-717 (MGC), 2004 WL 113506, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 26, 2004) (granting motion to preclude the defendant from "presenting arguments or evide