Epstein Secrets

xperiencing a mental health crisis at a parking lot in the suburb of New York City, according to an indictment filed July 19 in federal court. Under Stewart's direction, officers on the scene handcuffed the man behind his back and placed his legs in a restraint bag before he was to be transported for me

nment "manufactured child pornography and planted it on a computer hard drive to tie it to him," according to court papers. The article stated that Raniere's lawyers also said the feds "falsified, fabricated, and manipulated all the key evidence it used" to convict him of child exploitation and child po

roves the FBI planted evidence on his computer. The article added that in a response filed Friday in Brooklyn federal court, prosecutors wrote that Raniere's third attempt at securing a new trial — like his first two — was "entirely without merit," adding that the motion should be denied as "untimely, u

ey evidence it used" to convict him of child exploitation and child porn. Prosecutors, in the Friday filing, detailed the evidence the FBI found in Raniere's Halfmoon, NY, residence — including nude photos of his first sex slave, Camila, who was around 15 years old at the time. Robbers Posing as FBI Ag

); United States v. Raniere, No. 18 Cr. 204 (NGG), Dkt. 622 (precluding argument regarding propriety of Government's prosecution), United States v. Stewart, Cr. No. 03-717 (MGC), 2004 WL 113506, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 26, 2004) (granting motion to preclude the defendant from "presenting arguments or evide

to resolve for itself whether the government's conduct was lawful and to prevent Regan from presenting evidence on that subject."); United States v. Raniere, No. 18 Cr. 204 (NGG), Dkt. 622 (precluding argument regarding propriety of Government's prosecution), United States v. Stewart, Cr. No. 03-717 (MG

); United States v. Raniere, No. 18 Cr. 204 (NGG), Dkt. 622 (precluding argument regarding propriety of Government's prosecution), United States v. Stewart, Cr. No. 03-717 (MGC), 2004 WL 113506, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 26, 2004) (granting motion to preclude the defendant from "presenting arguments or evide

to resolve for itself whether the government's conduct was lawful and to prevent Regan from presenting evidence on that subject."); United States v. Raniere, No. 18 Cr. 204 (NGG), Dkt. 622 (precluding argument regarding propriety of Government's prosecution), United States v. Stewart, Cr. No. 03-717 (MG