Epstein Secrets

01/28, Fortinsky), NBC News (01/28, Kube, Kenny, Alsharif), the New York Times (01/28, Baker), Politico (01/28, McLeary, Seligman), Reuters (01/29, Stewart, Holland, Ali), USA TODAY (01/25, Brook, Meyer), and the Washington Post (01/28, Horton, Olorunnipa, Lamothe). Shooting Hoops, Changing Perceptions

Cromitie, convicted in 2010 of plotting to bomb Jewish sites and military aircraft, was granted "compassionate release" by U.S. District Court Judge Colleen McMahon, who criticized law enforcement for entrapment. According to the article, McMahon's release order highlighted that Cromitie, a small-time criminal,

anted "compassionate release" by U.S. District Court Judge Colleen McMahon, who criticized law enforcement for entrapment. According to the article, McMahon's release order highlighted that Cromitie, a small-time criminal, was coerced into the plot by the FBI's informant, Shaheed Hussain, who offered in

01/28, Fortinsky), NBC News (01/28, Kube, Kenny, Alsharif), the New York Times (01/28, Baker), Politico (01/28, McLeary, Seligman), Reuters (01/29, Stewart, Holland, Ali), USA TODAY (01/25, Brook, Meyer), and the Washington Post (01/28, Horton, Olorunnipa, Lamothe). Shooting Hoops, Changing Perceptions

Cromitie, convicted in 2010 of plotting to bomb Jewish sites and military aircraft, was granted "compassionate release" by U.S. District Court Judge Colleen McMahon, who criticized law enforcement for entrapment. According to the article, McMahon's release order highlighted that Cromitie, a small-time criminal,

anted "compassionate release" by U.S. District Court Judge Colleen McMahon, who criticized law enforcement for entrapment. According to the article, McMahon's release order highlighted that Cromitie, a small-time criminal, was coerced into the plot by the FBI's informant, Shaheed Hussain, who offered in

esident of Whatcom Community College; and Camille Stewart Gloster, Deputy National Cyber Director for Tech

ces as "unduly harsh and unjust," and condemned the FBI's involvement in radicalizing them. According to the article, the judge, U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon, described the men as being entrapped by overzealous FBI agents and a questionable informant into a scheme they would not have otherwise considered

esident of Whatcom Community College; and Camille Stewart Gloster, Deputy National Cyber Director for Tech

es as "unduly harsh and unjust," and condemned the FBI's involvement in radicalizing them. According to the article, the judge, U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon, described the men as being entrapped by overzealous FBI agents and a questionable informant into a scheme they would not have otherwise considered,

ed by FBI Agent Linda Stewart, which itself was based on the reports and investigation of FBI Agent William Brown. Id. at 1208. Unbeknownst to Agent Stewart, Agent Brown's Second Circuit in Brown v. Maxwell held a few months after Judge McMahon's ruling that Maxwell had reasonably relied on the Protecti

imum, this Court Should Order a Hearing at which Maxwell May Inquire into the Circumstances Surrounding the Government's Misrepresentation to Judge McMahon 26 Conclusion 27 Certificate of Service 29 EFTA00077572 Table of Authorities Cases Abdell v. City of New York, No. 05 CIV. 8453 KMK JCF, 20

21, 2017) 17 Martindeli v. Intl Tel. & Tel. Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979) 12, 13 S.E.C. v. TheStreet.Com, 273 F.3d 222 (2d Cir. 2001) 12 Stewart v. Hudson Hall LLC, 20 Civ. 885 (SLC), 2020 WL 7239676 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 9, 2020) 12 United States v. Avellino, 136 F.3d 249 (2d Cir. 1998) 16 United

epositions 4 C. The Settlement And Boles Schiller's Refusal To Comply With The Protective Order 6 D. The Government's False Statements To Judge McMahon 6 E. Judge Netburn Separately Rejects An Identical Gambit By The Government 10 ARGUMENT 11 A. Pursuant To Its Inherent Power, This Court Sho

imum, this Court Should Order a Hearing at which Maxwell May Inquire into the Circumstances Surrounding the Government's Misrepresentation to Judge McMahon 26 Conclusion 27 Certificate of Service 29 EFTA00028930 --- PAGE BREAK --- Table of Authorities Cases Abdell v. City of New York, No. 05 C

bscribed by FBI Agent Linda Stewart, which itself was based on the reports and investigation of FBI Agent William Id. at 1208. Unbeknownst to Agent Stewart, Agent Second Circuit in v. Maxwell held a few months after Judge McMahon's ruling that Maxwell had reasonably relied on the Protective Order's gu

epositions 4 C. The Settlement And Boles Schiller's Refusal To Comply With The Protective Order 6 D. The Government's False Statements To Judge McMahon 6 E. Judge Netburn Separately Rejects An Identical Gambit By The Government 10 ARGUMENT 11 A. Pursuant To Its Inherent Power, This Court Sho

21, 2017) 17 Martindeli v. Intl Tel. & Tel. Cotp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979) 12, 13 S.E.C. v. TheStreet.Com, 273 F.3d 222 (2d Cir. 2001) 12 Stewart v. Hudson Hall LLC, 20 Civ. 885 (SLC), 2020 WL 7239676 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 9, 2020) 12 United States v. Avellino, 136 F.3d 249 (2d Cir. 1998) 16 United

imum, this Court Should Order a Hearing at which Maxwell May Inquire into the Circumstances Surrounding the Government's Misrepresentation to Judge McMahon 26 Conclusion 27 Certificate of Service 29 EFTA00029101 --- PAGE BREAK --- Table of Authorities Cases Abdell v. City of New York, No. 05 C

ed by FBI Agent Linda Stewart, which itself was based on the reports and investigation of FBI Agent William Brown. Id. at 1208. Unbeknownst to Agent Stewart, Agent Brown's Second Circuit in Brown v. Maxwell held a few months after Judge McMahon's ruling that Maxwell had reasonably relied on the Protecti

epositions 4 C. The Settlement And Boies Schiller's Refusal To Comply With The Protective Order 6 D. The Government's False Statements To Judge McMahon 6 E. Judge Netburn Separately Rejects An Identical Gambit By The Government 10 ARGUMENT 11 A. Pursuant To Its Inherent Power, This Court Sho

21, 2017) 17 Martindeli v. Intl Tel. & Tel. Cotp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979) 12, 13 S.E.C. v. TheStreet.Com, 273 F.3d 222 (2d Cir. 2001) 12 Stewart v. Hudson Hall LLC, 20 Civ. 885 (SLC), 2020 WL 7239676 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 9, 2020) 12 United States v. Avellino, 136 F.3d 249 (2d Cir. 1998) 16 United