Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
kely that she would be able to establish that any personal or family hardship that might be caused by the extradition65 should outweigh the public "Ahmad v United Kingdom (2010) 51 EHRR SE6, para. 105. 60 R (Bermingham) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2007] QB 727, para. 100. 61 Extradition A
eedings. • Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16, [2008] 1 AC 920: Represented the Government of the United States in the House of Lords in the leading case on cartels and competition law, and the requirement of double criminality in extradition proceedings. • R (Bermingham) v Dire
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
kely that she would be able to establish that any personal or family hardship that might be caused by the extradition65 should outweigh the public "Ahmad v United Kingdom (2010) 51 EHRR SE6, para. 105. 60 R (Bermingham) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2007] QB 727, para. 100. 61 Extradition A
eedings. • Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16, [2008] 1 AC 920: Represented the Government of the United States in the House of Lords in the leading case on cartels and competition law, and the requirement of double criminality in extradition proceedings. • R (Bermingham) v Dire
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
kely that she would be able to establish that any personal or family hardship that might be caused by the extradition65 should outweigh the public "Ahmad v United Kingdom (2010) 51 EHRR SE6, para. 105. 60 R (Bermingham) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2007] QB 727, para. 100. 61 Extradition A
eedings. • Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16, [2008] 1 AC 920: Represented the Government of the United States in the House of Lords in the leading case on cartels and competition law, and the requirement of double criminality in extradition proceedings. • R (Bermingham) v Dire
Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA00011201
ly that she would be able to establish that any personal or family hardship that might be caused by the extradition65 should outweigh the public 59 Ahmad v United Kingdom (2010) 51 EHRR SE6, para. 105. 60 R (Bermingham) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2007] QB 727, para. 100. 61 Extradition A
Page: EFTA00011201 →Page EFTA00011212
eedings. • Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16, [2008] 1 AC 920: Represented the Government of the United States in the House of Lords in the leading case on cartels and competition law, and the requirement of double criminality in extradition proceedings. • R (Bermingham) v Dire
Page: EFTA00011212 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (111)
Entities connected to both Ahmad and the House of Lords
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON25 w/ Ahmad·3 w/ the
United States
LOCATION18 w/ Ahmad·6 w/ the
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON16 w/ Ahmad·6 w/ the
Michael Cohen
PERSON15 w/ Ahmad·5 w/ the
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION14 w/ Ahmad·5 w/ the
Julie K. Brown
PERSON15 w/ Ahmad·3 w/ the
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON12 w/ Ahmad·4 w/ the
Donald Trump
PERSON14 w/ Ahmad·2 w/ the
Prince Andrew
PERSON12 w/ Ahmad·2 w/ the
SA
Sanchez
PERSON8 w/ Ahmad·5 w/ the
George W. Bush
PERSON10 w/ Ahmad·3 w/ the
United Kingdom
LOCATION7 w/ Ahmad·5 w/ the
Heath
PERSON9 w/ Ahmad·2 w/ the
James Baker
PERSON7 w/ Ahmad·4 w/ the
High Court
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Ahmad·5 w/ the
Northern Ireland
LOCATION5 w/ Ahmad·5 w/ the
Samantha Power
PERSON8 w/ Ahmad·2 w/ the
Henderson
LOCATION5 w/ Ahmad·4 w/ the
Alfredo Rodriguez
PERSON7 w/ Ahmad·2 w/ the
Prince Charles
PERSON7 w/ Ahmad·2 w/ the