Epstein Secrets

Case 19-1018, Document 61, 08/01/2019, 2621854, Pagel of 10 19-1018-cr United States v. Boustani lin the Zfliniteb *Wes Court of appeats5 for the 6econb Circuit AUGUST TERM 2018 No. 19-1018-cr UN

pp'x 20, 24 (2c1 Cir. 2018) (non- precedential summary order). 6 EFTA00024838 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 19-1018, Document 61, 08/01/2019. 2621854, Pagel of 10 may be best understood as "a less onerous form of detention available only to the wealthy."12 We now expressly hold that the Bail Reform Act

ould be detained, a wealthy defendant 12 United States v. Banki, 369 F. App'x 152, 154 (2d Cir. 2010) (non- precedential summary order). " Smith v. Bennett, 365 U.S. 708, 714 (1961). 11 United States v. Zarrab, No. 15 CR 867, 2016 WL 3681423, at •13 (S.D.N.Y. June 16, 2016) (Richard M. Berman, J.). 7

Case 20-2413, Document 44, 08/20/2020, 2913556, Pagel of 78 20-2413 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit —against— GHISLAINE MAXWELL, SHARON CHURCHER, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, PlaintiffiAp

HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. Attorneys or e en ant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00076383 Case 20-2413, Document 44, 08/20/2020, 2913556, Paget of 78 Docket Entries App.-0001 Order regarding Ms. Maxwell's Letter Motion to Reconsider July 23, 2020 Ruling, Dated July 29, 2020 (Dkt. 1079) A

, issues or arguments not previously presented to the Court, nor may it be used as a vehicle for relitigating issues already decided by the Court." Bennett v. Watson Wyatt & Co., 156 F. Supp.2d 270, 271 (S.D.N.Y. 2001). Here, Ms. Maxwell's request for reconsideration hinges on her assertion that new d

Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74 20-2413 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Plaintlff-Appelke, —against— GHISLA1NE MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellant, SHARO

, issues or arguments not previously presented to the Court, nor may it be used as a vehicle for relitigating issues already decided by the Court." Bennett v. Watson Wyatt & Co., 156 F. Supp.2d 270, 271 (S.D.N.Y. 2001). Here, Ms. Maxwell's request for reconsideration hinges on her assertion that new d