Epstein Secrets

uderdale, FL 33301 Br ...da! Es Es . Fanner Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Fred Haddad, 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Ton'a Haddad Coleman Es . Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort

e work product privilege. This contention fails for two reasons: First, Edwards failed to properly assert the privilege as mandated by Rule 1.280 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and prevailing case law, see TIG Insurance Corp. of America v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 7 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7'h Street, Fort Lauder

le, FL 33301 Br .acHe .LEc .b ls, Es . Fanner Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Fred Haddad, Es 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Ton'a Haddad Coleman, Es . Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301

ter of these objections were speaking objections by Edwards's counsel that went beyond the scope of what is permitted in a deposition as provided in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and relevant case law. As this analysis demonstrates, Edwards neither complied with the spirit of Rule 1.130(c) of the Florida Rules of

erdale, FL 33301 Bradley J. Edwards, E Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Fred Haddad, Esq. EFTA00582843 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Ton'a Haddad Coleman, Es uire Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, 315 SE 7t

king of Epstein's affidavit is warranted. Edwards does not contend that Epstein failed to comply with a court order as contemplated by Rule 1.380 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure; nor does Edwards assert that Epstein's affidavit contains material that should be stricken from a pleading as delineated in Rule 1.140 o

uderdale, FL 33301 Br ...da! Es Es . Fanner Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Fred Haddad, 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Ton'a Haddad Coleman Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort

e work product privilege. This contention fails for two reasons: First, Edwards failed to properly assert the privilege as mandated by Rule 1.280 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and prevailing case law, see TIG Insurance Corp. of America v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 7 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7'h Street, Fort Lauder

le, FL 33301 Br .acHe .LEc .b ls, Es . Fanner Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Fred Haddad, Es 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Ton'a Haddad Coleman, Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301

ter of these objections were speaking objections by Edwards's counsel that went beyond the scope of what is permitted in a deposition as provided in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and relevant case law. As this analysis demonstrates, Edwards neither complied with the spirit of Rule 1.130(c) of the Florida Rules of

uderdale, FL 33301 Br ...da! Es Es . Fanner Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Fred Haddad, 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Ton'a Haddad Coleman Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 SE 7th Street, Suite 301 Fort

e work product privilege. This contention fails for two reasons: First, Edwards failed to properly assert the privilege as mandated by Rule 1.280 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and prevailing case law, see TIG Insurance Corp. of America v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 7 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7'h Street, Fort Lauder