Epstein Secrets

November of 23 2009. 24 Q Approximately 18 months -- about year and a 25 half? represented another law firm in a breakup of firma 2 And the Scherer firm waa owed over a million 4 5 4 7 • In Coos. And the client, the other law firm, was reneging on paying that. And Scherer won at the tria

even though the offices I worked II before you would file it, right? 12 out of wore in Miami. And I have heard of the Conrad 12 A Right. 13 Scherer firm throughout my practice. II Q Would you note every single fact that 14 4) You said one of the things in your direct 14 existed at the tim

1,8 61:6,8,18 61:21 62:3,8,24 62:25 86:16,19 shareholders 24:1,7 24:12 28:8 60:20 60:23 62:17,20 shares 61:12,15 sharing 43:20 sheriff 66:11 SHIPLEY 2:15 shock 30:4 158:16 shocked 28:24 shoes 27:1 shooting 11:9 shop 7:18 shots 45:9 show40:2 117:24 133:14 145:20,22 149:15 showed 16:16 58:

scale (1) 50:11 Scarola (17) 2:18,20 4:19,20 4:24 5:4,12,16 5:22 6:3 7:5 9:10 22:13,24 37:19 46:11,20 scheme (1) 19:22 schemes (1) 18:16 Scherer (1) 19:6 SCI (3) 27:16,19 28:4 scope (1) 21:21 SCOTT (1) 1:7 se (2) 2:13 40:16 SEARCY (1) 2:18 seat (1) 3:4 second (3) 25:11 29:9 31:

ts (3) 25:21 37:21 58:10 settled (2) 44:20,20 settlement (4) 15:23 36:1 42:11 45:8 settlements (4) 32:24 35:14,18 37:3 settles (1) 35:11 SHIPLEY (1) 2:18 shoes (2) 52:10,11 short (1) 56:15 showed (1) 34:7 shows (3) 31:25 43:21 44:16 side (11) 3:19 10:6,7 13:22 15:21,25 37:5 52:6

27:17 23:6 42:8 spectrum (1) 12 NI (2) schemes (1) set (5) sir (6) 54:11 1:24 62:18 18:16 6:15,16,18 5:12,18,22 6:9 split (3) RRA (2) Scherer (1) 37:25 54:21 21:1,9 3:13 46:15,19 37:11 44:3 19:6 sets (3) sitting (4) stage (3) RRA's (1) SCI (3) 25:21 37:21 43:8,9 52:10,11 35:10

581 75 31:12 41:20,21 resulted (1) 26:1 review (3) 10:13 26:17 44:9 46:6 56:21 Sasser's (5) second (3) 25:11 29:9 31:20 securities (1) SHIPLEY (1) 2:18 shoes (2) 52:10,11 31:13 34:3 59:4 sorry (2) 8:20 29:8 sort (1) 35:13 57:15 26:9,11 29:14 33:10 short (1) 33:20 59:17 43:11 47