Epstein Secrets

006) 7 Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beach, M., 760 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 2000) 2 Wolfe v. Foreman, 128 So. 3d 67 (FIa. 3d DCA 2013) passim Wright v. Yurko, 446 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) 19, 20, 21 iii EFTA00589620 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT This matter arises from the Appellant, Bradley

her jurisdictions are not controlling upon this Court, especially when there is binding Florida precedent directly applicable hereto. Additionally, the Florida Litigation Privilege is a court created doctrine, and as such, case law from other jurisdictions is of no import and has no bearing on this matter. Moreover, binding Fl

6) 7 Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beach, L.P., 760 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 2000) 2 Wolfe v. Foreman, 128 So. 3d 67 (FIa. 3d DCA 2013) passim Wright v. Yurko, 446 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) 19, 20, 21 iii EFTA00714923 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT This matter arises from the Appellant, Bradle

her jurisdictions are not controlling upon this Court, especially when there is binding Florida precedent directly applicable hereto. Additionally, the Florida Litigation Privilege is a court created doctrine, and as such, case law from other jurisdictions is of no import and has no bearing on this matter. Moreover, binding Fl

ite to the instant case, and as such its narrow holding has no bearing on, and should not be considered by, this Court. Similarly, Appellant cites Wright v. Yurko, 446 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) in support of his assertion that the litigation privilege is inapplicable to a malicious prosecution

her jurisdictions are not controlling upon this Court, especially when there is binding Florida precedent directly applicable hereto. Additionally, the Florida Litigation Privilege is a court created doctrine, and as such, case law from other jurisdictions is of no import and has no bearing on this matter. Moreover, binding Fl