Epstein Secrets

Third DCA opinion in 2000, both of which both 19 Judge Cope and the panel in the SCI case note that 20 the Supreme Court's citation in Levin to Wright 21 vs. Yurko, which I cited in the memorandum, which 22 was a Fifth DCA decision back in 1984, implicitly 23 recognizes -- that is the Supreme

e was an 4 explanation as to why those things were going on. 5 And the Rothstein firm imploded. And there was a 6 complaint that was brought by Bill Scherer I 7 believe down -- I don't know if it was Broward 8 County or Dade County. 9 THE COURT: Yeah, I'm familiar with all 10 that. 11 I remember

at's the phrase of all the cases reported. What facts and circumstances were known to Mr. Epstein when he filed his malicious prosecution. And the Wright versus Yorco (phonetic) case. We haven't talking about it, but -- THE COURT: I'm familiar with it. MS. ROCKENBACH: I'm sure, Your Honor. -- both

my client can rely on two parts. Rely on firsthand knowledge or trustworthy information provided to him. That's the Razorback lawsuit. That's Mr. Bill Scherer, the Fort Lauderdale attorney being quoted by the newspaper as saying that Epstein -- Rothstein didn't act alone. It's the head of the South Flori

Third DCA opinion in 2000, both of which both 19 Judge Cope and the panel in the SCI case note that 20 the Supreme Court's citation in Levin to Wright 21 vs. Yurko, which I cited in the memorandum, which 22 was a Fifth DCA decision back in 1984, implicitly 23 24 25 recognizes -- that is the

e was an 4 explanation as to why those things were going on. 5 And the Rothstein firm imploded. And there was a 6 complaint that was brought by Bill Scherer 7 believe down -- I don't know if it was Broward 8 County or Dade County. 9 TEE COURT: Yeah, I'm familiar with all 10 that. 11 I remember t