Epstein Secrets

l under federal law remain confidential when filed under seal in a state criminal proceeding. See Buenoano, 707 So. 2d at 717-18; see also State v. Wright, 803 So. 2d 793, 795 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). The non-prosecution agreement and addendum is confidential under federal 3 The Court in Buenoano constru

ted States v. John Doe Inc. I, 481 U.S. 102, 109 n.5 (1987); United States v. Eisenberg, 711 F.2d 959, 961 (11th Cir. 1983); Lance v. United States Dep't of Justice (In re Grand Jury Investigation), 610 F.2d 202, 213 (5th Cir. 1980). A ruling unsealing the non-prosecution agreement and addendum would not disclo

is reasonable in a particular case) [hereinafter Dep't of Justice, Attorney General Guidelines]; see also U.S. Dep'

. R. Crim. P. 15(d)(1)-(2). ~I The Advisory Committee recommended various changes to the rule in 1974, which Congress modified somewhat in 1975. See Wright, supra note 210, § 241, at 7-8. The changes discussed in this Article were initiated by the Advisory Committee. 222 Wright, supra note 210, § 244, a

istration of Justice and the Enforcement of Laws: Dep't of Justice Oversight Hearing Before the S. Judiciary Comm.,

d with fairness." In addition, the vicinage provision of 196 18 U.S.C.A. 3771(a)(8) (West 2004 & Supp. 2005). 197 Td. 3771 (a)(8). 198 See generally Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure 321, at 357-58. 199 See supra notes 158-174 and accompanying text. DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017740 --- PAGE B