Epstein Secrets

heard argument solely as to the litigation privilege. 2 EFTA00808206 the litigation privilege based upon the then binding precedent of Wolfe v. Foreman, 128 So. 3d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). Final judgment was thereafter entered in favor of Epstein. Edwards appealed the judgment as it pertained to his

ale, FL 33301 Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. Fanner Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Fred Haddad, Esq. 1 Financial Plaza Suite 2612 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, M. 315 SE 7th Street, S

egate any basis for fees. In moving for and obtaining dismissal, Epstein relied on a decision from the Third District Court of Appeal. See Wolfe v. Foreman, 128 So.3d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). No other reported decision in Florida — or any jurisdiction in the country — has extended absolute immunity of th

, Jr., Esq. W. CHESTER BREWER, JR., P.A. 250 S. Australian Ave., Ste. 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561)655-4777 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Fred Haddad, Esq. FRED HADDAD, P.A. 1 Financial Plaza, Ste. 2612 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 54) 467-6767 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Mark Nurik, Esq. LAW

t between the Fourth District Court of Appeal's decision in this matter and the decision rendered by the Third District Court of Appeal in Wolfe v. Foreman, 128 So. 3d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). Alternatively, should this Court not enter an Order staying these proceedings, Epstein requests that this Court

. Edwards, Esq. [email protected] Fanner Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Fred Haddad, Esq. [email protected] Fred Haddad, PA 1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire Tonja@tonjaha

han establish the fact that another trial court, just as this Court did in the case at hand, properly applied and followed the decision in Wolfe v. Foreman, 38 Ha. L. Weekly D1540 (July 17, 2013). Accordingly, with no change in the law or facts since the Court's original ruling, and with Edwards simply

ale, FL 33301 Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Fred Haddad, Esq. 1 Financial Plaza Suite 2612 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, P.A. 315 SE 7th Street,

order granting summary judgment in favor of Epstein upon application of the litigation privilege based upon the then binding precedent of Wolfe v. Foreman, 128 So. 3d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). Final judgment was thereafter entered in favor of Epstein. Edwards appealed the judgment as it pertained to his

Lauderdale, FL 33301 Brac lwards, E . Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Fred Haddad, Es 1 Financial Plaza Suite 2612 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Toria Haddad Coleman, Es uire Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, 315 SE 7th Street, Suite

. Fire Ins. Co., 639 So. 2d 606, 608 (Fla. 1994), Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barrett & Frappier v. Cole, 950 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 2007), and Wolfe v. Foreman, 38 Fla. L. Weekly D1540 (July 17, 2013). These cases provide the binding precedent in this area of law. All actions occurring during the course of

rik, Esq. 1 East Broward Blvd., Ste. 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. 425 N. Andrews Ave., Ste. 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Fred Haddad, Esq. 1 Financial Plaza, Ste. 2612 Ft. Lauderdale„FL 33301 Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. 315 SE 7th Si, Ste. 301 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 William

U.S. Fire Ins. Co., 639 So.2d 606, 608 (Fla. 1994), Bchevarria, McCalla. Ravmer, Barrett & Frappier v. Cole, 950 Sold 380 (Fla. 2007) and Wolfe v. Foreman 38 Fla. L. Weekly D1540 (July 17, 2013). The court finds these cases to be not only persuasive but binding. The court is bound by the holding of Lev

auderdale, FL 33301 Bradl J. Edwards uire Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N. Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Fred Haddad, Esquire a freclht rw.com 1 Financial Plaza Suite 2612 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Tonja Haddad Colema Esquire dill Law Offices of Tonja Haddad,

issue was one for the jury. However, this Court granted summary judgment in favor of Epstein based on the litigation privilege, relying on Wolfe v. Foreman, 128 So.3d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). Accordingly, Final Judgment was entered in favor of Epstein. 2 EFTA00613502 Edwards appealed the summary judgm

Chester Brewer, Jr., Esq. W. CHESTER BREWER, JR., P.A. 250 S. Australian Ave., Ste. 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Fred Haddad, Esq. FRED HADDAD, P.A. 1 Financial Plaza, Ste. 2612 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Mark Nurik, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF MARC S. NURIK 1 E. Broward B

EFTA00583962 summary judgment in favor of Epstein upon application of the litigation privilege based upon the then binding precedent of Wolfe v. Foreman, 128 So. 3d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). Final judgment was thereafter entered in favor of Epstein. Edwards appealed the judgment as it pertained to his

rdale, FL 33301 Bra . .. a lwards E . Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Fred Haddad, Es . 1 Financial Plaza Suite 2612 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Toria Haddad Coleman, Es uire Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, 315 SE 7th Street, Suit

ken by him occurred during the litigation of his abuse of process claim against Edwards. For support, he relies primarily on the decision of Wolfe v. Foreman, 2013 WL 3724763 (Fla. 3d DCA July 17, 2013), wherein the Third District found that the litigation privilege barred both an abuse of process claim a

Lehrman, FL 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Attomeys for Jeffrey Epstein Fred Haddad, Esquire [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Fred Haddad, P.A. One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 Fort Lauderdale, FL 3339