Epstein Secrets

nt. Additional reporting on the story was provided by the New York Post (01/07, Propper), People (01/06, Hernandez), MSNBC (01/06, Lim), CNN (01/05, Wolfe, Razek, Yan, Williams), Al Jazeera (01/05, Staff Writer), Independent (01/06, McHardy), Rolling Stone (01/05, Madarang), BBC (01/05, Kim), The Hill

ith Responds To Trump Legal Team Arguing For Special Counsel To Be Held In Contempt NBC News (01/05, Reilly, Lebowitz) reported that Special Counsel Jack Smith's team responded to former President Donald Trump's legal team's request to hold Smith in contempt for filing motions ahead of deadlines in a federal

search, "There is no way a search warrant would be approved when the evidence in question was located inside of Vice President Biden's guest house." Wolfe stated that, "The optics prevented such a search." Is the FBI -- do they make a routine practice of allowing partisan political optics to prevent i

and that is wrong, and you need to right that wrong. Let me ask you about some of the disturbing allegations that have come out of special Counsel Jack Smith's political crusade against President Trump. And we've seen a heavily redacted search warrant. Here you go with the first page. Here, you've got a pa

Gregorian) (2), New York Times (11/14, Green, Thrush, Feuer), NPR (11/15, Bond), Politico (11/14, Svirnovskiy, Orden) (2), Reuters (11/14, Sullivan, Wolfe), USA Today (11/15, Anderson), Wall Street Journal (11/14, Leary, McGraw), Washington Examiner (11/16, Hallas) (2) (3) (4), Washington Times (11/14,

ervatives, citing records indicating that two officials who blocked an FBI probe of Clinton's 2016 dossier payments later served on Special Counsel Jack Smith's "Arctic Frost" team, which issued sweeping subpoenas for Republican lawmakers' and Trump administration officials' phone records. Why Anthropic's A