Epstein Secrets

ld" followed by telephone calls; stated he was interested in having vaginal intercourse with "13 yr-old" minor & was willing to travel from FL to Kansas City; arrested when he arrived at airport. 2422(b); 2423(b) Not Consummated Sting Government appealed dismissal of indictment. Appellate court reve

or but instead undercover agent. Appellate court affirmed enhancement because pattern of activity used minor interchangeably with victim. U.S. I Manley, Slip Copy, 2007 WL 1379982 (11th Cir. 2007) Slip Copy Not for Publication Internet Internet chat room communications between father of 12 yr

ld" followed by telephone calls; stated he was interested in having vaginal intercourse with "13 yr- old"minor & was willing to travel from FL to Kansas City; arrested when he arrived at airport. Government appealed dismissal of indictment. Appellate court reversed because actual minor not required. 2

r but instead undercover agent. Appellate court affirmed enhancement because pattern of activity used minor interchangeably with victim. U.S. v. Manley, • Slip Copy, 2007 WL Slip Copy Not for Internet Internet chat room communications between father of 12 yr-old boy and 2422(6); 2252A(a)(1) &

telephone calls; stated he was interested in having vaginal intercourse with "13 yr- old"minor & was willing to travel from Not Consummated FL to Kansas City; arrested when he arrived at airport. Government appealed dismissal of indictment. Appellate court reversed because actual minor not required. S

r but instead undercover agent. Appellate court affirmed enhancement because pattern of activity used minor interchangeably with victim. U.S. v. Manley, Slip Copy, 2007 WL Slip Copy Not for Internet Internet chat room communications between father of 12 yr-old boy and 2422(b); 2252A(a)(1) & (

ld" followed by telephone calls; stated he was interested in having vaginal intercourse with "13 yr-old" minor & was willing to travel from FL to Kansas City; arrested when he arrived at airport. Government appealed dismissal of indictment. Appellate court reversed because actual minor not required. 2

or but instead undercover agent. Appellate court affirmed enhancement because pattern of activity used minor interchangeably with victim. U.S.'. Manley, Slip Copy, 2007 WL Slip Copy Not for Internet Internet chat room communications between father of 12 yr-old boy and 2422(b); 2252A(a)(1) & (