Epstein Secrets

and rule on pending motions, even ones that seem straightforward. This Court, if called upon, reviews those decisions — it does not preempt them." USA Today (7/9, Phillips, 10.31M) reports that, "if the kill appeals court agrees to rehear the case, it would resurrect the prospect of challenging the Just

USA Today (7/9, Wolf, 10.31M) says "the 7-2 decision...written by Chief Justice John Roberts and joined by Trump's two nominees, Associate Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh," sends "the separation of powers dispute back to lower courts for further determination." The Washington Post (7/9, Barnes, 14

.2M) says "the question for the court was whether Congress officially eliminated the Creek Nation reservation when Oklahoma became a state in 1907." Gorsuch wrote, "If Congress wishes to withdraw its promises, it must say so. Unlawful acts, performed long enough and with sufficient vigor, are never enoug

of justice, if the firing of the director and those other things were geared toward eliminating or stopping our investigation of Russian activity." USA Today <https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/11/10/we-did-our-job-ex-fbi-deputy-andrew- mccabe-defend-russia-inquiry/6231684002/> (11/10, Johns

ated on Tuesday that they would reject attempts by Republicans and the Trump administration to kill the Affordable Care Act," while Justices Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Clarence Thomas "seemed poised to vote to strike down the law." Politico <https://www.politico.cominews/2020/11/10/supreme-court-obamacare-kava

M) reports Garland "vowed to uphold the independence of a Justice Department that had suffered deep politicization under the Trump administration." USA Today (2/22, Behrmann, Santucci, 12.7M) reports, "Garland was often pressed by Republican senators over the political independence of the Justice Departm

ylvania, refusing to take up a months-long dispute over extending the deadline in that state for receiving mail-in ballots." Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Clarence Thomas "said it deserved the court's attention, even though the number of votes at issue would not call into question Biden's victory

of justice, if the firing of the director and those other things were geared toward eliminating or stopping our investigation of Russian activity." USA Today (11/10, Johnson, 10.31M) reports, "McCabe said investigators had reason to think that Trump `posed a danger to national security." Investigators had

cated on Tuesday that they would reject attempts by Republicans and the Trump administration to kill the Affordable Care Act," while Justices Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Clarence Thomas "seemed poised to vote to strike down the law." Politico (11/10, Luthi, 4.29M) says that "many legal observers believed this c

ncluding the president's extraordinary move Friday evening to grant clemency to Stone just days before he was due to report to prison." Similarly, USA Today (7/11, Johnson, 10.31M) reports Mueller "defend[ed] the prosecution of Roger Stone and the larger investigation into Russia interference in the 2016

hat EFTA00150721 during Trump's Tulsa campaign rally, he "ranked his Supreme Court appointments among his biggest achievements," touting Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. However, Baker added Trump "might not have felt so warmly on Thursday after" the justices "categorically dismissed his claim t

of justice, if the firing of the director and those other things were geared toward eliminating or stopping our investigation of Russian activity." USA Today (11/10, Johnson, 10.31M) reports, "McCabe said investigators had reason to think that Trump 'posed a danger to national security." Investigators had

cated on Tuesday that they would reject attempts by Republicans and the Trump administration to kill the Affordable Care Act," while Justices Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Clarence Thomas "seemed poised to vote to strike down the law." Politico (11/10, Luthi, 4.29M) says that "many legal observers believed this c