4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
stage theory: a Piagetian revision. Human Development, 22:89-112, 1978. Cib79. J. J. Gibson. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979. CICH08. B. Goertzel, M. Ikle, I. Goertzel, and A. Heljalcka. Probabilistic Logic Networks. Springer, 2008. Ci182. Carol Cilligan. In a Dif
o you tell when you're 25% or 50% of the way to having an AGI that can pass the Turing Test, or get an online university degree. Fooling 50% of the Turing Test judges is not a good measure of being 50% of the way to passing the Turing Test (that's too easy); and passing 50% of university classes Ls not a go
l stage theory: a Piagetian revision. Human Development, 22:89-112, 1978. Gib79. J. J. Gibson. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979. GIGHO8. B. Goertzel, M. Ikle, I. Goertzel, and A. Heljakka. Probabilistic Logic Networks. Springer, 2008. Gil82. Carol Gilligan. In a Differ
do you tell when you’re 25% or 50% of the way to having an AGI that can pass the Turing Test, or get an online university degree. Fooling 50% of the Turing Test judges is not a good measure of being 50% of the way to passing the Turing Test (that’s too easy); and passing 50% of university classes is not a goo
ish “analog” versus “digital.” Digital signal encoding was entirely compatible with cybernetic thinking—in 33 The Human Use of Human Beings (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1954), p. 17-18. 125 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016928 fact, enabling to it. What was constraining to cybernetics was the presumption of an analogy of struc
to you. They have to know what the human is confused about. What has long been difficult for me to understand is, What’s the point of a conventional Turing Test? What’s the motivation? As a toy, one could make a little chat bot that people could chat with. That will be the next thing. The current round of dee
ish “analog” versus “digital.” Digital signal encoding was entirely compatible with cybernetic thinking—in 33 The Human Use of Human Beings (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1954), p. 17-18. 125 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016345 fact, enabling to it. What was constraining to cybernetics was the presumption of an analogy of struc
to you. They have to know what the human is confused about. What has long been difficult for me to understand is, What’s the point of a conventional Turing Test? What’s the motivation? As a toy, one could make a little chat bot that people could chat with. That will be the next thing. The current round of dee
Entities connected to both Houghton Mifflin and Turing Test

Stephen Hawking
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Samantha Power
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Oliver Stone
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Prince Charles
PERSON
Harvard University
ORGANIZATION
Barack Obama
PERSONLeon Black
PERSONCourtney Wild
PERSON
Eric Trump
PERSON
Harvey Weinstein
PERSON
University of Oxford
ORGANIZATIONDoug Band
PERSON
Vicky Ward
PERSON
Marvin Minsky
PERSON
Lawrence Krauss
PERSON