Epstein Secrets

# 4, pp 41-50. (Selection for:: The Best American Science and Nature Writing , (2003) Richard Dawkins, guest editor; Tim Folger, series editor. NY: Houghton Mifflin --Reprinted in Roesch, R. & Gagnon, N. (Eds) (2007) Psychology and law. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate. Hyman, I.E., & Loftus, E.F. (2002) False childhood

973 Johns Hopkins University Harvard University Columbia University University of Colorado Conference on Cognition, Perception, and Adaptation, University of Minnesota Bell Laboratories Perception Consortium of New York 34 EFTA00073103 1974 University of Oregon University of Kansas Washington Defense Counse

ish “analog” versus “digital.” Digital signal encoding was entirely compatible with cybernetic thinking—in 33 The Human Use of Human Beings (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1954), p. 17-18. 125 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016928 fact, enabling to it. What was constraining to cybernetics was the presumption of an analogy of struc

judgment to violate the fundamental norms of what it is to be objective (and therefore scientific). Near the end of the 20th century, a paper by two University of Minnesota psychologists summarized a vast literature that had long roiled the waters of prediction. One side, they judged, had for all too long held resolutely

ish “analog” versus “digital.” Digital signal encoding was entirely compatible with cybernetic thinking—in 33 The Human Use of Human Beings (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1954), p. 17-18. 125 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016345 fact, enabling to it. What was constraining to cybernetics was the presumption of an analogy of struc

judgment to violate the fundamental norms of what it is to be objective (and therefore scientific). Near the end of the 20th century, a paper by two University of Minnesota psychologists summarized a vast literature that had long roiled the waters of prediction. One side, they judged, had for all too long held resolutely