Epstein Secrets

uffice to drive some kind of non-emotional, serene Buddha intelligence). I am nevertheless interested in understanding and modeling them. > I think Antonio Damasio and his successors have made a very good case that emotion plays a key role in reasoning. (Not just motivation, actual emotion.) Most of what I wou

making a merely philosophical point here, with respect to the basic requirements for Intelligence. I think that emotion is highly interesting, that Damasio is quite correct with respect to what emotion does, and that it makes a lot of sense (and is fun) to equip AIs with emotion, mood, affect and emoti

OS that coordinates the swapping, my computer is likely to malfunction. But from this I cannot infer that computers cannot work without swapping. Damasio's argument does not convince me because he does not elucidate a functional role that would emotion an absolute requirement for an artificial mind. L

ffrey Epstein wrote: waste? Forwarded message From: Joscha Bach <1 Date: Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 6:42 PM Subject: Re: Today's discussion To: "S.M. Kosslyn" Cc: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Dear Stephen, thank you for your so far unending patience in that discussion. --> http://www.xkcd.com/3

42 PM Subject: Re: Today's discussion To: "S.M. Kosslyn" Cc: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Dear

uffice to drive some kind of non-emotional, serene Buddha intelligence). I am nevertheless interested in understanding and modeling them. > I think Antonio Damasio and his successors have made a very good case that emotion plays a key role in reasoning. (Not just motivation, actual emotion.) Most of what I wou

making a merely philosophical point here, with respect to the basic requirements for Intelligence. I think that emotion is highly interesting, that Damasio is quite correct with respect to what emotion does, and that it makes a lot of sense (and is fun) to equip AIs with emotion, mood, affect and emoti

OS that coordinates the swapping, my computer is likely to malfunction. But from this I cannot infer that computers cannot work without swapping. Damasio's argument does not convince me because he does not elucidate a functional role that would emotion an absolute requirement for an artificial mind. L

ffrey Epstein wrote: waste? Forwarded message From: Joscha Bach <1 Date: Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 6:42 PM Subject: Re: Today's discussion To: "S.M. Kosslyn" Cc: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Dear Stephen, thank you for your so far unending patience in that discussion. --> http://www.xkcd.com/3

42 PM Subject: Re: Today's discussion To: "S.M. Kosslyn" Cc: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Dear

uffice to drive some kind =f non-emotional, serene Buddha intelligence). I am nevertheless =nterested in understanding and modeling them. » I think Antonio Damasio and his successors have made a very good case » =hat emotion plays a key role in reasoning. (Not just motivation, » actual =motion.) > Most of wha

=his I cannot infer that computers cannot work without swapping. I believe that Richard Gregory had a version of that argument well =efore Sloman > Damasio's argument does not convince me because he does not elucidate = functional role that would emotion an absolute requirement for an =rtificial mind.

From: S.M. Kosslyn Sent: Friday, February .... To: Joscha Bach Cc: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Today's discussion Hi J.. Some responses and reflections below

a Bach Cc: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Today's discussion Hi J.. Some responses and reflections below... JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ Stephen M. Kosslyn Director, Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences Stanford University 75 Alta Road Stanford, CA 94305 Voice: On 14 Feb 2013, at 3:4

From: S.M. Kosslyn Sent: Friday, February .... To: Joscha Bach

uffice to drive some kind =f non-emotional, serene Buddha intelligence). I am nevertheless =nterested in understanding and modeling them. > I think Antonio Damasio and his successors have made a very good case =hat emotion plays a key role in reasoning. (Not just motivation, actual =motion.) Most of what I wou

making a merely philosophical point =ere, with respect to the basic requirements for Intelligence. I think =hat emotion is highly interesting, that Damasio is quite correct with =espect to what emotion does, and that it makes a lot of sense (and is =un) to equip Ms with emotion, mood, affect and emotion

From: Joscha Bach Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 11:42 PM To: S.M. Kosslyn Cc: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Today's discussion Dear Stephen, thank you for your so far unending patience in that discussion. --> =ttp://ww

Thursday, February 14, 2013 11:42 PM To: S.M. Kosslyn Cc: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Today's disc

suffice to drive some kind =f non-emotional, serene Buddha intelligence). I am nevertheless =nterested in understanding and modeling them. I think Antonio Damasio and his successors have made a very good case =hat emotion plays a key role in reasoning. (Not just motivation, actual =motion.) >» Again, thank yo

From: S.M. Kosslyn Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 1:33 AM To:

I do indeed use the Mail app on a Mac. So.. I'll just write, and see if =t does the job! Thanks, s. J_IJ_LIJ_IJJJJJJJJJ_LIJ_IJJJ_IJ_IJJJJJJJJ_I Stephen M. Kosslyn Director, Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences Stanford University 75 Alta Road Stanford, CA 94305 Voice: 1 On 13 Feb 2013, at 1

From: S.M. Kosslyn Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 1:33 AM To: Joscha Bach Cc: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: Today's discussion Hi J.. I do indeed use the Ma

ction. I am sure that chimps also possess much of logic, and yet they won't be able to learn how to program. >> emotion is highly interesting, that Damasio is quite correct with respect to what emotion does, and that it makes a lot of sense (and is fun) to equip Als with emotion, mood, affect and emotio

From: Joscha Bach To: "S.M. Kosslyn" <=MI > Cc: Jeffrey Epstein <a Subject: Re: Today's discussion Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 03:16:16 +0000 Dear Stephen, Berlinale is over and I got b

From: Joscha Bach To: "S.M. Kosslyn" <=MI > Cc: Jeffrey Epstein <a Subject: Re: Tod

n Cacioppo: Cell: Murray Gell-man: Work: Home: M (Aspen Home in July: Danny Hillis: Work: Home: Cell: Charles Harper: Cell: phone number Antonio Damasio: need email response for a Work: EFTA00744882

Cell: and Roger Schank: Cell: Home: Seth Llociai Home: Cell: Work: Marvin Mins Gloria : Home: Cell: Work: Mark Hauser: Work: Cell: Steve Kosslyn: Home: Cell: Work: Richard Axel: Work: Cell: Victoria Stodden: Cell: Boris Nikolic: Lawrence Krauss: Cell: Work: = Lee Smolin: Cell: Work

Cell: Work: Mark Hauser: Work: Cell: Steve Kosslyn: Home: Cell: Work: Richard Axel: Work: Cell:

ultan, nathan feigenbaum, ramashandran, goelberg. demasio, shristakas brockman hillis, kaufman, seligman. g

ta susskind, strominger krauss, hopkins. randall, kosslyn, gardner gates, thiel. hoffman, hoie sinofsky, sh

e Church: dmin. Assistant: Yve Lisa Randall: Dan Dubno: Cell: Pablos Holman: John Cacioppo: Murray Gell-man: Dann Hillis: Charles Harper: Antonio Damasio: EFTA00305754

LIST OF SCIENTISTS Mark Tramo: Roet iank: Seth Llo d: Marvin Minsky (Gloria): ome: Mark Hauser: Steve Kossly Richard Axel: Victoria Stodden: Boris Nikolic: Lawrence Krauss: Lee Smolin: Martin Nowak Corina Tamita:l Geoffrey West: Corrina : EFTA00305

12:45pm Appt w/Todd Meister (1 2:30pm Appt w/Larry Delson ( ) ) 3:30pm Appt w/Dr. Mechanick (1192 Park between 93/94 Ground Level) 6:00pm Appt w/Antonio Damasio ( 6:00pm Appt w/David Blaine ( 6:45pm Appt w/Terje ) MARCH 2013 FRL MARCH 1, 2013 NY-PB 7:30am Appt w/Larry Delson ( ) 8:00am Breakfast w/Rei

EFTA00299822 (10:30am Cutting Edge to come to the house to work on 6th Floor Movie Room) 11:00am Appt w/Barnaby Marsh 12:00pm Lunch w Pro essor Kossl n, Ben Nelson and Senator Bob Kerrey (Kosslyn: 1:30pm Appt w/Eileen Alexanderson, Carl n McCa re via hone , Ada, Tom and Alan Halperin (via phone)