Epstein Secrets

B O'NEAL,ALLEN VANGIESON,ANN GIBSON,SUSAN STEWARD,CAMPBELL GURRENTZ,MAR

ELSON,EDWARD HEATHWOOD,DESMOND J BEYER,LAWRENCE WYCKKOFF,SHELBY PUCILLO,DE

t it be accused of unproven coercion. Informal resolution, p952] Congress' preferred course, will therefore become even more difficult. See West v. Gibson, 527 U.S. 212, 218-19, 119 S. Ct. 1906, 144 L. Ed. 2d 196 (1999) (noting Congress's intention that Title VII claims would be resolved informally).

224, 1238 (10th Cir. 2004), so much so that Ihrighly fact-based, complex, difficult matters" arise as a matter of routine, Amchem, 521 U.S. at 630 (Breyer, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). Unsurprisingly, then, we give district courts "broad discretion in deciding whether to allow the ma

ersed and remanded. ROBERTS, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which THOMAS, GINSBURG, ALITO, SOTOMAYOR, KAGAN, and GORSUCH, JJ., joined. BREYER, J., filed a dissenting opinion. KAVANAUGH, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028542 --- PAGE BREAK ---

, 576 U.S. — _ (2015) (slip op., at 14) (noting that the words "re- straint of trade'" in the Sherman Act have been interpreted dynamically); West v. Gibson, 527 U.S. 212, 218 (1999) (interpreting the term "appropriate'" in Title VII's reme- dies provision dynamically); and Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos. v. D