Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
is fundamentally ambiguous or imprecise, the truthfulness of [the defendant's] answers is an issue for the jury." Id. at 304; see United States v. Kaplan, 758 F. App'x 34, 39 (2d Cir. 2018) (same); cf. Lighte, 782 F.2d at 374 (finding the evidence insufficient where some answers "were literally true
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature ofcell phone location records," which
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
is fundamentally ambiguous or imprecise, the truthfulness of [the defendant's] answers is an issue for the jury." Id. at 304; see United States v. Kaplan, 758 F. App'x 34, 39 (2d Cir. 2018) (same); cf. Lighte, 782 F.2d at 374 (finding the evidence insufficient where some answers "were literally true
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature of cell phone location records," whic
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
is fundamentally ambiguous or imprecise, the truthfulness of [the defendant's] answers is an issue for the jury." Id. at 304; see United States v. Kaplan, 758 F. App'x 34, 39 (2d Cir. 2018) (same); cf. Lighte, 782 F.2d at 374 (finding the evidence insufficient where some answers "were literally true
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature of cell phone location records," whic
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
is fundamentally ambiguous or imprecise, the truthfulness of [the defendant's] answers is an issue for the jury." Id. at 304; see United States v. Kaplan, 758 F. App'x 34, 39 (2d Cir. 2018) (same); cf. Lighte, 782 F.2d at 374 (finding the evidence insufficient where some answers "were literally true
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature of cell phone location records," whic
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (252)
Entities connected to both Kaplan and the Carpenter Court
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON227 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ the
George Mitchell
PERSON58 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON51 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ the
Julie K. Brown
PERSON50 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ the
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON49 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ the
Michael Jackson
PERSON46 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ the
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON47 w/ Kaplan·2 w/ the
United States
LOCATION45 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ the
Chris Tucker
PERSON44 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ the
Colorado
LOCATION44 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ the
Minnesota
LOCATION43 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ the
Michigan
LOCATION44 w/ Kaplan·3 w/ the
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION39 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ the
Stephen Hawking
PERSON38 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION33 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ the
Oregon
LOCATION32 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ the
Bradley Edwards
PERSON30 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ the
Bill Richardson
PERSON28 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ the
North Carolina
LOCATION28 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ the
Kentucky
LOCATION28 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ the