Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
is fundamentally ambiguous or imprecise, the truthfulness of [the defendant's] answers is an issue for the jury." Id. at 304; see United States v. Kaplan, 758 F. App'x 34, 39 (2d Cir. 2018) (same); cf. Lighte, 782 F.2d at 374 (finding the evidence insufficient where some answers "were literally true
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
is fundamentally ambiguous or imprecise, the truthfulness of [the defendant's] answers is an issue for the jury." Id. at 304; see United States v. Kaplan, 758 F. App'x 34, 39 (2d Cir. 2018) (same); cf. Lighte, 782 F.2d at 374 (finding the evidence insufficient where some answers "were literally true
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
is fundamentally ambiguous or imprecise, the truthfulness of [the defendant's] answers is an issue for the jury." Id. at 304; see United States v. Kaplan, 758 F. App'x 34, 39 (2d Cir. 2018) (same); cf. Lighte, 782 F.2d at 374 (finding the evidence insufficient where some answers "were literally true
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
is fundamentally ambiguous or imprecise, the truthfulness of [the defendant's] answers is an issue for the jury." Id. at 304; see United States v. Kaplan, 758 F. App'x 34, 39 (2d Cir. 2018) (same); cf. Lighte, 782 F.2d at 374 (finding the evidence insufficient where some answers "were literally true
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (253)
Entities connected to both Kaplan and Herring v. United States
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON227 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ Herring
George Mitchell
PERSON58 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ Herring
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON51 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ Herring
Julie K. Brown
PERSON50 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ Herring
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON49 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ Herring
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON47 w/ Kaplan·3 w/ Herring
Michael Jackson
PERSON46 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ Herring
United States
LOCATION45 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ Herring
Chris Tucker
PERSON44 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ Herring
Colorado
LOCATION44 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ Herring
Michigan
LOCATION44 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ Herring
Minnesota
LOCATION43 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ Herring
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION39 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ Herring
Stephen Hawking
PERSON38 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ Herring
the Southern District
LOCATION33 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ Herring
Oregon
LOCATION32 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ Herring
Bradley Edwards
PERSON30 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ Herring
North Carolina
LOCATION28 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ Herring
Kentucky
LOCATION28 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ Herring
Bill Richardson
PERSON28 w/ Kaplan·4 w/ Herring