7
Shared Docs
7
Same-Page
7 / 7
Mentions
ording, if we have to descend to legalities. Not just for taxes, which is what I am requesting, but for daily life. As you know, the trusts were in Carol's name for two reasons: one, we assumed that she would be the survivor, and two, for estate tax reasons, to assure that the three children would rec
s always required an explanation to go along with it. In Avi's case, you and Mommoy interfered to tell her that something was going very wrong with Sandi and that she had to get professional help; to practically force her to go meet with a lawyer Mommoy found for her when she became convinced that Av
ve occurred to you. Aside from many factual errors in your letter, which I won't review, I'm also amazed, and shocked, to read such statements as "Carol's intention to leave some money to your children." Carol's intention? Alone? Not my intention? Is this your conception of what our family life was?
s always required an explanation to go along with it. In Avi's case, you and Mommoy interfered to tell her that something was going very wrong with Sandi and that she had to get professional help; to practically force her to go meet with a lawyer Mommoy found for her when she became convinced that Av
galities. Not just for taxes, which is what I am requesting, but for daily life. 7 EFTA_R1_01693047 EFTA02542386 As you know, the trusts were in Carol's name for two reasons: one, we a=sumed that she would be the survivor, and two, for estate tax reasons, to assure that the three children would rec
as always required an explanation to go along with it. In Avi's case, you and Mommoy interfered to tell her that something=was going very wrong with Sandi and that she had to get professional help; to practically force her to go meet with a lawyer Mommoy found for her when she became convinced that Av
wording, if we have to descend to legalities. Not just for taxes, which is what I am requesting, but for daily life. As you know, the trusts were in Carol's name for two reasons: one, we a=sumed that she would be the survivor, and two, for estate tax reasons, to assure that the three children would rec
as always required an explanation to go along with it. In Avi's case, you and Mommoy interfered to tell her that something=was going very wrong with Sandi and that she had to get professional help; to practically force her to go meet with a lawyer Mommoy found for her when she became convinced that Av
ording, if we have to descend to legalities. Not just for taxes, which is what I am requesting, but for daily life. As you know, the trusts were in Carol's name for two reasons: one, we a=sumed that she would be the survivor, and two, for estate tax reasons, to assure that the three children would rec
s always required an explanation to go along with it. In Avi's case, you and Mommoy interfered to tell her that something=was going very wrong with Sandi and that she had to get professional help; to practically force her to go meet with a lawyer Mommoy found for her when she became convinced that Av
for the survivor. Seizing on this technicality, Max contrived a story about our dividing up our resources, with me responsible for my portion, and Carol responsible for her portion and for the children. This mad idea of course never occurred either to us, or to Eric. 2 EFTA_R1_01631179 EFTA02502742
re too bright) and no one came up afterwards, a little to my surprise. We spent most of the day at the Oakland airport. Alex had written to me that Sandi was p=egnant, but I didn't know whether to believe it. Amy confirmed it, and sa=d she would have the baby in Japan. Very welcome news. About your l
ave occurred to you. Aside from many factual errors in your letter, whic= I won't review, I'm also amazed, and shocked, to read such statemen=s as "Carol's intention to leave some money to your children." Car=l's intention? Alone? Not my intention? Is this your concepti=n of what our family life was?
s always required an explanation to go along with it. In Avi's case, you and Mommoy interfered to tell her that something=was going very wrong with Sandi and that she had to get professional help; to practically force her to go meet with a lawyer Mommoy found for her when she became convinced that Av
Entities connected to both Carol and Sandi

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Noam Chomsky
PERSON
Valeria Chomsky
PERSON
Richard Kahn
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSONLexington
LOCATIONWellfleet
ORGANIZATION
Princess Diana
PERSON
Eric Trump
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSONBainco
ORGANIZATIONDiane
PERSONDeborah
PERSONAnthony
PERSON
Wales
LOCATION
George W. Bush
PERSONJohn Smith Drive
LOCATIONOxfam House
ORGANIZATIONHarry Chomsky
PERSON