Epstein Secrets

. HHPO12. Adam Hampshire, Roger Highfield, Beth Parkin, and Adrian Owen. Fractionating human intelli- gence. Neuron vol. 76 issue 6, 2012. Hib02. Bill Hibbard. Superintelligent Machines. Springer, 2002. Hof79. Douglas Hofstadter. Cadet, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. Basic, 1979. Hof95. Douglas

stage theory: a Piagetian revision. Human Development, 22:89-112, 1978. Cib79. J. J. Gibson. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979. CICH08. B. Goertzel, M. Ikle, I. Goertzel, and A. Heljalcka. Probabilistic Logic Networks. Springer, 2008. Ci182. Carol Cilligan. In a Dif

08. HHPO12. Adam Hampshire, Roger Highfield, Beth Parkin, and Adrian Owen. Fractionating human intelli- gence. Neuron vol. 76 issue 6, 2012. Hib02. Bill Hibbard. Superintelligent Machines. Springer, 2002. Hof79. Douglas Hofstadter. Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. Basic, 1979. Hof95. Douglas Ho

l stage theory: a Piagetian revision. Human Development, 22:89-112, 1978. Gib79. J. J. Gibson. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979. GIGHO8. B. Goertzel, M. Ikle, I. Goertzel, and A. Heljakka. Probabilistic Logic Networks. Springer, 2008. Gil82. Carol Gilligan. In a Differ

replace Homo in situations requiring respect, dignity, or care, while others (author Pamela McCorduck and computer scientists like John McCarthy and Bill Hibbard) replied that machines can be more impartial, calm, and consistent and less abusive or mischievous than people in such positions. Equality What did

ish “analog” versus “digital.” Digital signal encoding was entirely compatible with cybernetic thinking—in 33 The Human Use of Human Beings (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1954), p. 17-18. 125 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016928 fact, enabling to it. What was constraining to cybernetics was the presumption of an analogy of struc

replace Homo in situations requiring respect, dignity, or care, while others (author Pamela McCorduck and computer scientists like John McCarthy and Bill Hibbard) replied that machines can be more impartial, calm, and consistent and less abusive or mischievous than people in such positions. Equality What did

ish “analog” versus “digital.” Digital signal encoding was entirely compatible with cybernetic thinking—in 33 The Human Use of Human Beings (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1954), p. 17-18. 125 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016345 fact, enabling to it. What was constraining to cybernetics was the presumption of an analogy of struc