Epstein Secrets

D., Psychology, Stanford University, 1970 TEACHING EXPERIENCE Permanent Distinguished Professor, University of California, Irvine, 2002 — present Psychological Science, 2002- Criminology, Law & Society, 2002 — Cognitive Sciences, 2002- Fellow, Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 2002- Founding Direct

DC National Academy of Arbitrators, New Orleans Judicial Conference of Washington, DC University of UMEA, Sweden Cleveland-Marshall Law School, Cleveland Indiana University Law School, Bloomington Indiana University Psychology Department Hebrew University, Jerusalem Cornell University Washington A

earch in Brief. Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Barsalou, L.W. (2003). Verifying different-modality properties for concepts produces switching costs. Psychological Science, 14, 119-124. People v. Shirley, 181 Cal. Rptr. 243 (1982). Perfect, T. J., Wagstaff, G. F., Moore, D., Andrews, B., Cleveland, V., Newcombe, S.,

mited mental resources by offering them the option to close their eyes when recalling (Bekerian & Dennett, 1997; Perfect, Wagstaff, Moore, Andrews, Cleveland, Newcombe, Brisbane, & Brown, 2008). Doing so, however, requires that the interviewer has developed good rapport with the witness. EFTA01657019 7

London: HMSO. Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Barsalou, L.W. (2003). Verifying different-modality properties for concepts produces switching costs. Psychological Science, 14, 119-124. Pennebaker, J. W. (1990). Opening up: The healing power of confiding in others. New York: W. Morrow. EFTA01657061 People v. Shirle

r eyes before responding, as that is known to enhance concentration, presumably by reducing visual interference (Perfect, Wagstaff, Moore, Andrews, Cleveland, Newcombe, Brisbane, & Brown, 2008). Requesting witnesses, and especially victims, to close their eyes during the interview should be done only afte