Epstein Secrets

mso, Norway American Assn of Public Welfare Attorneys, Seattle Japanese Psych Assn (keynote), Tokyo Japan Federation of Bar Associations, Tokyo University of Colorado, Denver Current Topics in Mental Health & Law, Seattle Criminal Lawyers' Assn, Toronto Criminal Trial Lawyers Assn, Alberta, Canada Johns Hopkin

iley. Wells, G.L, & Loftus, E.F. (1988). Eyewitness testimony. International Encyclopedia of Communications. Annenberg School of Communications and Oxford University Press. McSpadden, M., Schooler, J.W., & Loftus, E.F. (1988). Here today, gone tomorrow: The appearance and disappearance of context effects. in G. Davies

w School University of Lethbridge, Canada Banff Conference on Cognitive Science, Canada Society of British Columbia, Continuing Legal Education Fordham University, NY Legal Aid Society, NY AIDS Survey Research Methodology Conference, Rockville, MD Course for prosecuting and defense attorneys, Northwestern

973 Johns Hopkins University Harvard University Columbia University University of Colorado Conference on Cognition, Perception, and Adaptation, University of Minnesota Bell Laboratories Perception Consortium of New York 34 EFTA00073103 1974 University of Oregon University of Kansas Washington Defense Counse

ng precisely the tiny, residual “statistical differences among individuals.” 32 Matthew Amold, Culture and Anarchy, Jane Garnett, ed. (Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 2006). 112 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016915 To be sure, some recent achievements in artificial intelligence have been remarkably impressive. Computers can

judgment to violate the fundamental norms of what it is to be objective (and therefore scientific). Near the end of the 20th century, a paper by two University of Minnesota psychologists summarized a vast literature that had long roiled the waters of prediction. One side, they judged, had for all too long held resolutely

ng precisely the tiny, residual “statistical differences among individuals.” 32 Matthew Amold, Culture and Anarchy, Jane Garnett, ed. (Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 2006). 112 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016332 To be sure, some recent achievements in artificial intelligence have been remarkably impressive. Computers can

judgment to violate the fundamental norms of what it is to be objective (and therefore scientific). Near the end of the 20th century, a paper by two University of Minnesota psychologists summarized a vast literature that had long roiled the waters of prediction. One side, they judged, had for all too long held resolutely