Epstein Secrets

1), 125-137. doi:10.3758/BF03193392 Skeem, J. L, Douglas, K. S., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2009). Psychological science in the courtroom. New York, NY: Guilford. State of California v. William Hamilton Ayres, Case Nos. SC064366A and 5F350769A (Superior Court of California, San Mateo County, 2007). Talaric

e and neglect: Specificity of effects on adolescent and young adult depression and suicidality. Child 6 Adolescent Psychlaig, 38, 1490-1496. Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1995). Jeopardy in the courtroom: A scientific analysis of chiklren's testimony. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

119. Reprinted in: Jurimetrics Journal, 15, 1975, p188-193.; The Cincinnati Post, January 21, 1975; Annual Editions: Readings in Psychology 75/76. Guilford, CT: Dushkin Publishing Group, 1975; Student Lawyer, 3, 1975, 38-51.; Psychologie Heute, April, 1975; N.W. Peralta (Ed.) (1975). Personal awareness

8 Loftus, E.F., Nucci, M., & Hoffman, H. (1998) Manufacturing memory. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 16, 63-75. 20 EFTA00073089 Ceci, S. J., Bruck, M., & Loftus, E. F. (1998) On the ethics of memory implantation research. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, 230-240. Greene, E. & Loftus, E

ight, R. (2005). Investigative interviewing. In N. Brewer & K. Williams (Eds.), Psychology and Law: An empirical perspective (pp. 11-42). New York: Guilford. RAND Corporation (1975, October). The criminal investigation process (Vol. 1-3), Rand Corporation Technical Report R-1776-DOJ, Santa Monica, CA.

nitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration 14, 31-39. Geiselman, R. E, Fisher, R. P., Firstenberg, I., Hutton, L. A., Sullivan, S. J., Avetissian, I. V., & Prosk, A. L. (1984). Enhancement of eyewitness memory: An empirical evaluation of the cognitive interview. Journal of Police