Epstein Secrets

1), 125-137. doi:10.3758/BF03193392 Skeem, J. L, Douglas, K. S., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2009). Psychological science in the courtroom. New York, NY: Guilford. State of California v. William Hamilton Ayres, Case Nos. SC064366A and 5F350769A (Superior Court of California, San Mateo County, 2007). Talaric

at individuals may be more reluctant to disclose a rectal than a genital exam because of societal and socioemotional factors (e.g., embarrassment; Saywitz, Goodman, Nichols, & Moan, 1991). For abuse-related events that did not occur, no par- ticipant falsely reported that either the doctor or nurse c

ver, P. R. (1998). Repressed memories of ritualistic and religion-related abuse. In S. Lynn & K. McConkey (Ed.), Truth in memory (pp. 260-283). NY: Guilford. Eisen, M., Goodman, G. S., Qin, J. J., & Davis, S. (1998). Memory and suggestibility in maltreated children: New research relevant to evaluating a

ts on children of testifying in court. In K. Oates (Ed.), Understanding and managing child sexual abuse (pp. 293-311). W. B. Sanders Publishing Co. Saywitz, K. J., Goodman, G. S., & Myers, J. (1990). Can children provide accurate eyewitness reports? in J. Conte (Ed.), Violence Update. Newbury Park, CA:

tion of children. • Goodman, GS., & Bottoms, B.L. (Eds.) (1993). Child victims, child witnes,ses: Understanding and improving testimony. New York: Guilford. • Hazelwood, R.R.,;,& Burgess, A.W. (Eds.) (2001). Practical aspects of rape •• investigation (3rd ed). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. • • . Heger

intermittently. This section will not include a detailed discussion of the latest research and specific techniques for interviewing children. (See Saywitz, Goodman, & Lyon, 2002). Only the law-enforcement perspective of child-victim interviewing and some general guidelines will be discussed here. Law

ight, R. (2005). Investigative interviewing. In N. Brewer & K. Williams (Eds.), Psychology and Law: An empirical perspective (pp. 11-42). New York: Guilford. RAND Corporation (1975, October). The criminal investigation process (Vol. 1-3), Rand Corporation Technical Report R-1776-DOJ, Santa Monica, CA.

inst guessing is recommended, especially with children or mentally challenged persons who may have difficulty taking on the perspectives of others (Saywitz, Geiselman, & Bornstein, 1992). Review Reviewing the information already notated allows the interviewer to check on its accuracy. It also provides

y on Peters. In J. Doris (Ed.), The suggestibility of children's recollections (pp. 77- 82). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. Saywitz, K. J., Goodman, G. S., Nicholas, E., & Moan, S. (1991). Children's memories of physical examinations involving genital touch: Implications for repo

in maltreated children: New research relevant to evaluating allegations of abuse. In S. Lynn & K. McConkey (Ed.), Truth in memory (pp. 163489). NY: Guilford. Goodman, G. S., Quas, J., & Redlich, A. D. (1998). The ethics of conducting false memory studies with children: A reply to Herrmann and Yoder. App