Epstein Secrets

ndant caused one or more telephone calls to be made to a telephone used by Jane Doe #4. 12. On June 4, 2004, Defendants EPSTEIN and traveled from New Haven, Connecticut to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Defendant HYPERION AIR, INC. 13. On June 11, 2004, Defendants E

d engage in illegal sexual activity. In other words, the illegal sexual activity must have not been merely incidental to the trip. United States v. Hayward, 359 F.3d 631, 637-38 (3d Cir. 2004). See also United States v. Garcia-Lopez , 234 F.3d 217, 220 (5th Cir. 2000) (The district court did not err in

engage in illegal sexual activity. In other words, the illegal sexual activity must have not been merely incidental to the trip. United States v. Hayward, 359 F.3d 631, 637-38 (3d Cir. 2004). See also United States v. Garcia-Lopez, 234 F.3d 217, 220 (5th Cir. 2000) (The district court did not err in i

ant caused one or more telephone calls to be made to a telephone used by Jane Doe #4. 12. On June 4, 2004, Defendants EPSTEIN and traveled from New Haven, Connecticut to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Defendant HYPERION AIR, INC. 13. On June II, 2004, Defendants E

d engage in illegal sexual activity. In other words, the illegal sexual activity must have not been merely incidental to the trip. United States v. Hayward, 359 F.3d 631, 637-38 (3d Cir. 2004). See also United States v. Garcia-Lopez , 234 F.3d 217, 220 (5th Cir. 2000) (The district court did not err in

ndant caused one or more telephone calls to be made to a telephone used by Jane Doe #6. 12. On June 4, 2004, Defendants EPSTEIN and traveled from New Haven, Connecticut to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Defendant HYPERION AIR, INC. 13. On June 11, 2004, Defendants E