Epstein Secrets

1/2019) 07/11/2019 2 ORDER granting I Motion to Seal Document as to Jeffrey Epstein (1). Defense motion granted. Materials to be hand delivered to Chambers (and opposing counsel) by 9:00 AM, July 12, 2019. (Signed by Judge Richard M. Berman on 7/11/2019) (clt) (Entered: 07/12/2019) 07/12/2019 1Q MEMO

redaction after 90 calendar days.... (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 08/06/2019) 08/14/2019 44 LETTER as to Jeffrey Epstein addressed to Chief Jud h e Colleen McMahon and Judge Richard M. Berman from dated August 10, 2019 re: I am writing to notify the Court of the death of Jeffrey Epstein, who passed away Satu

tter known to some as the "Preppy Killer," was released after spending 15 years in prison for drug and assault charges, according to state records. Chambers spent a similar amount of time in prison after pleading guilty to strangling Jennifer Levin in New York City's Central Park during the summer of 198

ces as "unduly harsh and unjust," and condemned the FBI's involvement in radicalizing them. According to the article, the judge, U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon, described the men as being entrapped by overzealous FBI agents and a questionable informant into a scheme they would not have otherwise considered

tter known to some as the "Preppy Killer;' was released after spending 15 years in prison for drug and assault charges, according to state records. Chambers spent a similar amount of time in prison after pleading guilty to strangling Jennifer Levin in New York City's Central Park during the summer of 198

es as "unduly harsh and unjust," and condemned the FBI's involvement in radicalizing them. According to the article, the judge, U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon, described the men as being entrapped by overzealous FBI agents and a questionable informant into a scheme they would not have otherwise considered,

e previously used to obtain subpoenas in this case. As Defendants noted in their opposition papers, Defendants previously acted at the direction of Chambers to have subpoenas signed by the Clerk of Court. (Dcfs.' Glenwood Opp'n at 20.) In the future, however, the parties shall provide subpoena requests t

arc inadmissible on hearsay or other grounds. See. e.g., United States v. Boyle, No. 08 CR 523 (CM), 2009 WL 484436, at •2 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2009) (McMahon, J.) (quashing subpoena for investigative file as overbroad because although part of the investigative file "may be relevant to the case at bar," t

epositions 4 C. The Settlement And Boies Schiller's Refusal To Comply With The Protective Order 6 D. The Government's False Statements To Judge McMahon 6 E. Judge Netburn Separately Rejects An Identical Gambit By The Government 10 ARGUMENT 11 A. Pursuant To Its Inherent Power, This Court Sho

Benkovitch v. Gorilla, Inc., No. 2:15-ev-7806 (WJM), 2017 WL 4005452 (D.N.J. Sept. 12, 2017) 17 Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Ck 2019) 3, 6 Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 510 U.S. 32 (1991) 17 Chemical Bank v. Affiliated FM Ins. Co., 154 F.R.D. 91 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) passim Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S.

epositions 4 C. The Settlement And Boles Schiller's Refusal To Comply With The Protective Order 6 D. The Government's False Statements To Judge McMahon 6 E. Judge Netburn Separately Rejects An Identical Gambit By The Government 10 ARGUMENT 11 A. Pursuant To Its Inherent Power, This Court Sho

Benkovitch v. Gorilla, Inc., No. 2:15-ev-7806 (WJM), 2017 WL 4005452 (D.N.J. Sept. 12, 2017) 17 Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Ck 2019) 3, 6 Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 510 U.S. 32 (1991) 17 Chemical Bank v. Affiliated FM Ins. Co., 154 F.R.D. 91 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) passim Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S.

epositions 4 C. The Settlement And Boies Schiller's Refusal To Comply With The Protective Order 6 D. The Government's False Statements To Judge McMahon 6 E. Judge Netburn Separately Rejects An Identical Gambit By The Government 10 ARGUMENT 11 A. Pursuant To Its Inherent Power, This Court Sho

Benkovitch v. Gorilla, Inc., No. 2:15-ev-7806 (WJM), 2017 WL 4005452 (D.N.J. Sept. 12, 2017) 17 Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41 (2d Ck 2019) 3, 6 Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 510 U.S. 32 (1991) 17 Chemical Bank v. Affiliated FM Ins. Co., 154 F.R.D. 91 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) passim Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S.