Epstein Secrets

ers' back to Steele. The fact that this kind of information in an FBI communication was classified as `secret' in the first place is unexplainable." Casey concluded, "The information that Danchenko provided was the last nail in the coffin of the Steele dossier, and it created a serious dilemma for the

ntrol of TikTok in the US. The New York Times <https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/02/business/economy/trump-tiktok-china-national-security.html> (8/2, Swanson, Crowley, Isaac, 18.61M) reports Microsoft said Sunday it would "continue to pursue the purchase of TikTok in the United States after consulting wit

to negotiate a sale" of TikTok to Microsoft. The New York Times <https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/31/technology/tiktok-microsoft.html> (7/31, Isaac, Swanson, 18.61M) says lawmakers "and the Trump administration have increasingly questioned whether TikTok is susceptible to influence from the Chinese gover

ers' back to Steele. The fact that this kind of information in an FBI communication was classified as 'secret' in the first place is unexplainable." Casey concluded, "The information that Danchenko provided was the last nail in the coffin of the Steele dossier, and it created a serious dilemma for the

rces said, as the Administration weighs whether to support a deal that would give the company control of TikTok in the US. The New York Times (8/2, Swanson, Crowley, Isaac, 18.61M) reports Microsoft said Sunday it would "continue to pursue the purchase of TikTok in the United States after consulting wit

2005. (Def. Mot. 7, Ex. D at i). The defendant's claims relating to Michael Casey and Detective Recarey fare no better. She again speculates that Casey and Detective Recarey, who passed away in August 2017 and May 46 EFTA00100013 2018 respectively, would have testified, and that such testimony wo

States v. Stringer, 730 F.3d 120 (2d Cir. 2013) 228, 229, 231 United States v. Strohm, 671 F.3d 1173 (10th Cir. 2011) 180, 190 United States v. Swanson, 210 F.3d 788 (7th Cir. 2000) 170 EFTA00099963 United States v. Sweig, 441 F.2d 114 (2d Cir. 1971) 207,211,217 United States v. Tanu, 589 F.

2005. (Def. Mot. 7, Ex. D at i). The defendant's claims relating to Michael Casey and Detective Recarey fare no better. She again speculates that Casey and Detective Recarey, who passed away in August 2017 and May 46 EFTA00077678 2018 respectively, would have testified, and that such testimony wo

States v. Stringer, 730 E 3d 120 (2d Cir. 2013) 228, 229, 231 United States v. Strohm, 671 F.3d 1173 (10th Cir. 2011) 180, 190 United States v. Swanson, 210 F.3d 788 (7th Cir. 2000) 170 EFTA00077628 United States v. Sweig, 441 F.2d 114 (2d Cir. 1971) 207, 211, 217 United States v. Tanu, 589

2005. (Def. Mot. 7, Ex. D at i). The defendant's claims relating to Michael Casey and Detective Recarey fare no better. She again speculates that Casey and Detective Recarey, who passed away in August 2017 and May 46 EFTA00039493 2018 respectively, would have testified, and that such testimony wo

States v. Stringer, 730 E 3d 120 (2d Cir. 2013) 228, 229, 231 United States v. Strohm, 671 F.3d 1173 (10th Cir. 2011) 180, 190 United States v. Swanson, 210 F.3d 788 (7th Cir. 2000) 170 EFTA00039443 United States v. Sweig, 441 F.2d 114 (2d Cir. 1971) 207, 211, 217 United States v. Tanu, 589

2005. (Def. Mot. 7, Ex. D at i). The defendant's claims relating to Michael Casey and Detective Recarey fare no better. She again speculates that Casey and Detective Recarey, who passed away in August 2017 and May 46 EFTA00095138 2018 respectively, would have testified, and that such testimony wo

States v. Stringer, 730 F.3d 120 (2d Cir. 2013) 151, 152, 153 United States v. Strohm, 671 F.3d 1173 (10th Cir. 2011) 120, 127 United States v. Swanson, 210 F.3d 788 (7th Cir. 2000) 115 United States v. Sweig, 441 F.2d 114 (2d Cir. 1971) 139, 141, 145 United States v. Tanu, 589 F.2d 82 (2d Cir

ers' back to Steele. The fact that this kind of information in an FBI communication was classified as `secret' in the first place is unexplainable." Casey concluded, "The information that Danchenko provided was the last nail in the coffin of the Steele dossier, and it created a serious dilemma for the

rces said, as the Administration weighs whether to support a deal that would give the company control of TikTok in the US. The New York Times (8/2, Swanson, Crowley, Isaac, 18.61M) reports Microsoft said Sunday it would "continue to pursue the purchase of TikTok in the United States after consulting wit

2005. (Def. Mot. 7, Ex. D at i). The defendant's claims relating to Michael Casey and Detective Recarey fare no better. She again speculates that Casey and Detective Recarey, who passed away in August 2017 and May 46 EFTA00103071 2018 respectively, would have testified, and that such testimony wo

States v. Stringer, 730 E 3d 120 (2d Cir. 2013) 228, 229, 231 United States v. Strohm, 671 F.3d 1173 (10th Cir. 2011) 180, 190 United States v. Swanson, 210 F.3d 788 (7th Cir. 2000) 170 EFTA00103021 United States v. Sweig, 441 F.2d 114 (2d Cir. 1971) 207, 211, 217 United States v. Tanu, 589

h is consistent with the leading case of State v. Casey, !7! which considered whether a victim's request

either mandatory nor absolute" (quoting United States v. Carter, 756 F.2d 310, 311 (3d Cir. 1985))). 9 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(1) (2006). °! See, e.g., Swanson v. United States, 224 F.2d 795, 798 (9th Cir. 1955) (applying the principle of expressio unius est exclusio alterius when constructing Fed. R. Crim.