Epstein Secrets

wrs Financial Corp., et al filed 02/19/93 Inv v. Towers Financial, et al filed 02/23/93 Batten, et al v. Towers Financial, et al filed 02/23/93 Casey, et al v. Twrs Financial Corp., et al filed 02/25/93 Leibman, et a! v. Towers Financial, et al filed 02/25/93 Penner v. Towers Financial. ct al

failed take-over attempt of Pan American Airways, Inc. ("Pan Am"). When the take-over failed, largely due to the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, United Fire and Associated suffered devastating trading losses, resulting in attendant losses for investors in TFC. 28. Epstein and Hof

attery. Actions were consoliclab ed by Multiclistrict Litigation Panel. Vari- ous defendants fded motions to dismiss. Holdings: The District Court, Casey, J., held that (1) jurisdictional discovery was warranted on issue whether Saudi Arabian bank was immune under Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act

ter and personal jurisdiction in a case aris- EFTA00795072 S08 349 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT, 2d SERIES ing from the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland. The court found it had subject matter jurisdiction over defendant Libya, a designated state sponsor of terror, pursuant to § 1605(a)(7)

battery. Actions were consolidat- ed by Multidistrict Litigation Panel. Vari- ous defendants filed motions to dismiss. Holdings: The District Court, Casey, J., held that: (1) jurisdictional discovery was warranted on issue whether Saudi Arabian bank was immune under Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FS

t mat- ter and personal jurisdiction in a case aris- HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017872 --- PAGE BREAK --- 808 ing from the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland. The court found it had subject matter jurisdiction over defendant Libya, a designated state sponsor of terror, pursuant to § 1605(a)(7) of