3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 4
Mentions
ATIONS 96,185.00 Based on Lily email dated 9-16.2011 I think the difference relates to: Amended complaint overbillings (RK 39,993.75 vs 20,000 per Fowler) 19,993.75 DK (all billings) 13,488.67 Olavarria (all billings) 8,931.20 MJ (11130/2010 & 12/31/2010 & 1131/2011) 61,955.70 Total Estimate of
2/28/11 124,266.25 Rothstein 150,000.00 3/22/11 2/28/11 2,381.25 DK 3/31/11 184,961.25 Rothstein 3/31/11 264.00 DK 3/31/11 1,444.00 Olavarria 4/30/11 393.75 DK 4/30/11 525.00 Olavarria 5/18/11 49,781.30 costs thru 5/18/2011 51,674.30 5/19/11 carney, united reporting & 5/19/11
Rothstein 28,331.25 7/31/11 55,455.00 Rothstein 7/31/11 4,858.93 DK 7/31/11 1,861.20 Olavarria 8/30/11 4,408.49 DK 8/30/11 3,918.75 Olavarria Rothstein- 106.187.50 time 17,481.62 Rothstein-costs 100,000.00 9/15/11 discount 39,993.75 140,000.00 9/19/11 Rothstein- 9/30/11 82,822.5
From: Richard Kahn < Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 7:25 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Fowler My records show that the balance due is 114,731.38 vs 220,552.89 per =owler. I do not know exactly how they calculated their amount and am shocked
n accounting of how they got to their =igure. I believe based on Lilly's email dated 9-16-2011 that the difference of =05,821.51 relates to MJ, DK, Olavarria and 20k difference in =vercharging for amended complaint. The MJ, DK & Olivarria all should have been resolved when we paid =50,000 on July 5th as
From: Richard Kahn Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 7:25 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Fowler My records show that the balance due is 114,731.38 vs 220,552.89 per =owler. I do not know exactly how they calculated their amount and am shocked
n accounting of how they got to their =igure. I believe based on Lilly's email dated 9-16-2011 that the difference of =05,821.51 relates to MJ, DK, Olavarria and 20k difference in =vercharging for amended complaint. The MJ, DK & Olivarria all should have been resolved when we paid =50,000 on July 5th as
Entities connected to both Fowler and Olavarria