Epstein Secrets

ain any copies of the documents contained on the discs provided to it, nor shall any images or copies of said documents be retained in the memory of Fowler White's copiers. Should it be determined that Fowler White or Epstein retained images or copies of the subject documents on its computer or otherwi

otion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not be Held in Contempt of Court, to Penn it Discovery, to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for Other Appropriate Relief [D.E. 6326] (the "Motion for Order to Show Cause"), the Responses [D.E. 6351, 6355], and the Reply [D.E. 6358] th

Epstein's co-counsel contacted Fowler White and inquired about any confidentiality orders concerning the CD, counsel was specifically told that the Fowler White attorney could not specifically remember due to the age of the file, but that he thought there was such an order and that Epstein's counsel sh

Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Court, to Permit Discovery, to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for Other Relief (DE 6323; re-docketed as DE 6326) and Bradley Edwards' Joinder in Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause (DE 6325)i. T

h. (Apr. Tr. 42:1-12.) The Court also allowed the deposition of a representative of Fowler White to explain under oath and to answer the question if Fowler 'The April 13, 2018, hearing transcript (D.E. 6367) shall be referred to as "Apr. Tr." 2 EFTA00794257 White retained any copies in its computers

Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not be Held in Contempt of Court, to Permit Discovery, to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for Other Appropriate Relief. (D.E. 6326.) Edwards and L.M. joined that request. (D.E. 6325; D.E. 6345.) Movants allege that Fowler White EFTA

nation: "Perhaps I'm being a bit naive when I say that having served Mr. Epstein in their capacity as counsel, it's my respectful belief that they [Fowler White] owed an obligation to Mr. Epstein, if not this Court, to explain how and why they had access and kept these records in their possession in li

reply to Jeffrey Epstein's Response in Opposition to ■., ■., and Jane Doe's Joinder in Motion for Order to Show Cause and Motion for Discovery, to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for Other Appropriate Relief [DE 6353]. INTRODUCTION In their motion, the Victims sought sanctions against Fowler White and Epstein for illega