Epstein Secrets

36:13,22 following 1:17 28:3 footnote 8:11 foregoing 50:10 form 34:4 35:10 Fort 1:16 forth 46:7 forward 35:10 found 10:8 29:15,19 44:13,19 Fowler 2:14 4:7,9 8:10 8:23 10:13 11:1,3 12:11,12,16,19 13:5.8 13:9 14:1,17,23,25 15:6,15 16:25 17:5 18:6,15 20:15,16,20 22:6,11,25 23:1,6,21 24:12 2

0 16:21 18:2025:17,17 27:7 33:9 38:18,18,20 38:20,22,22 42:15,18 43:12 45:7 47:9,19 48:9,13 maybe 23:3 24:2 27:9 38:23 42:15 ma'am 4:18 6:21 McClean 29:8,22 31:1 McLACHLAN 24:11 24:12,25 25:9 McLAUCHLAN 2:13 4:6,7 7:14 8:22 10:21 10:25 11:9 25:6 mean 39:7 40:10 42:19 means 32:18 meant 24:1

t we have been informed that that disk was 12 included in one of 36 boxes that were reviewed by the law 13 firm of Link & Savory, obtained from the Fowler White law 14 firm, who were predecessor counsel to Mr. Epstein, and 15 were the direct object of this Court's order prohibiting 16 retention of th

OUELLETTE & MA LDIN RT REPORTERS, INC. EFTA00787710 Page 29 Page 31 1 provisions of Title 11. I order. That is by definition in the In Re: McClean case, 2 Courts have held, and we've cited them in 2 and countless other 11th Circuit cases, and lower court 3 our motion, that Bankruptcy Courts

t, but we have been informed that that disk was included in one of 36 boxes that were reviewed by the law firm of Link & Sartory, obtained from the Fowler White law firm, who were predecessor counsel to Mr. Epstein, and were the direct object of this Court's order prohibiting retention of that specif

laid out, I don't think there could ever be a basis for it, but this also gets to the discovery point, and even though the 11th Circuit in In Re: McClean, they affirm a finding of punitive damages, which are by definition criminal, because it's punishment, as opposed to purely compensatory damages,