Epstein Secrets

l ruling on March 8, 2018, incorrectly asserting that the Court prohibited Epstein from referring, in any way, to the 27,000+ pages contained on the Fowler White CD. His claim is that Epstein violated this Court's ruling the four times Epstein "referenced" the documents at issue in one filing with this

he November 2010 Agreed Order outlined how Fowler White would print copies of documents to be produced in response to Epstein's Subpoena directed to the Bankruptcy Trustee. Pursuant to that Order, Fowler White was not to retain any copies of the documents contained on the disc or any images of the documents in the mem

this Court's verbal ruling on March 8, 2018, asserting that Epstein was prohibited from referring, in any way, to the 27,000+ pages contained on the Fowler White CD. His claim is that Epstein violated this Court's ruling the four times Epstein "referenced" the documents at issue in one filing with this

r merely described the procedure by which Fowler White would print copies of documents to be produced in response to Epstein's Subpoena directed to the Bankruptcy Trustee and directed Fowler White not to retain any copies of the documents contained on the disc or any images of the documents in the memories of its copi

ed over by them to Link & Rockenbach? A. No. Not to the best of my knowledge. Q. Have you ever communicated with Tonja or Fred Haddad about the Fowler White disc? A. Not to the best of my knowledge. Q. Did you ever receive a copy of the disc itself? A. No. 5 EFTA00793405 Case 09-34791-RBR

2. As part of that representation, Fowler White represented me in proceedings in this case concerning a Subpoena that my original counsel issued to the Bankruptcy Trustee. 3. In November 2017, I retained Link & Rockenbach, PA, to represent me in the state court proceeding. 4. In February 2018, Scott .1. Link of Li