Epstein Secrets

this Court's verbal ruling on March 8, 2018, asserting that Epstein was prohibited from referring, in any way, to the 27,000+ pages contained on the Fowler White CD. His claim is that Epstein violated this Court's ruling the four times Epstein "referenced" the documents at issue in one filing with this

ers. Whether or not Fowler White and/or Epstein complied with that directive is squarely and appropriately before the court that issued the Order — the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. 2See March 8, 2018, Afternoon Hearing Transcript, 62:6-12 (Court allowed Epstein to file the exhibits under

aring, this Court entered a blanket confidentiality order prohibiting Epstein from using or referring to, in any way, the documents contained on the Fowler White CD: As a general blanket order I would simply say that all attorneys who have or are representing Mr. Epstein shall be subject to this order

filed his Supplement to the Motion to Strike, which identified a Federal Court Order issued on November 30, 2010 by the Honorable Raymond B. Ray of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, prohibiting Epstein's prior counsel, Fowler White, from creating or retaining the CD in question, and reservin

er, Jr., Esq. FIRM/COMPANY: Atterbury Goldberger et al. ATTENTION: Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. FACSIMILE NUMBER: TELEPHONE NUMBER: FIRM/COMPANY: Fowler White Burnett ATTENTION: Rodney Jospeph James FACSIMILE NUMBER: TELEPHONE NUMBER: PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY IF NOT RECEIVED PROPERLY The inf

rotective Order as to a Subpoena issued upon him for records to be produced by March 16, 2011 and states: 1. First, jurisdiction over RRA rests in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of In Re: Rothstein, Rosenfeld and Adler, Case No. 09- 34791-BKC-RER. This Court has effectively re