Epstein Secrets

ion of Fowler White and Mr. Ackerman (of which Mr. Cassell has not even the slightest of proof), then the most one could say is that for eight years Fowler White and Mr. Ackerman held a disc but never used any of the information contained on it. Frankly, no competent lawyer could review the materials t

te disk containing all the confidential materials..." (Joinder, p. 3). There is no dispute that the documents maintained on a disc transferred from Fowler White are eight years old. There is further no dispute that Edwards and Cassell are fully aware of the documents contained on the disc — they claim the c

in any copies of the documents contained on the discs provided to it, nor shall any images or copies of said documents be retained in the memory of Fowler White's copiers. Should it be determined that Fowler White or Epstein retained images or copies of the subject documents on its computer or otherw

11 BRADLEY EDWARDS' SUMMARY OF DAMAGES Bradley J. Edwards, by and through undersigned counsel and pursuant to the Court's Order to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not Be Held in Contempt and Scheduling Evidentiary Show Cause Hearing, hereby files this Summary of Damages, and states

n of privilege has ever been made. In addition, the Bankruptcy Court has already issued an Order to show cause allowing discovery focused on whether Fowler White and/or Epstein violated the November 2010 Agreed Bankruptcy Order. Moreover, this Court has ruled that at this point, the 47 exhibits are not

Order to the Bankruptcy Court's attention. Specifically, on March 19, 2018, Edwards; moved the Bankruptcy Court to issue an order to show cause why Fowler White and Epstein should not be held in contempt of court, to permit discovery, to assess sanctions and costs and for other appropriate relief. (Exhibit

ter or otherwise, the court retains jurisdiction to award sanctions in favor of Farmer, Brad Edwards or his client." The bankruptcy court permitted Fowler White access to the electronic data because the firm could make the copies and number the documents without reviewing the contents, and this avoided

Farmer Jaffe asked that Epstein bear the costs of copying and organizing the documents but also expressed concern about Epstein and his counsel at Fowler White possibly misappropriating them, Farmer Jaffe recounted. The bankruptcy court granted the copying request with strict instructions that Fowler White

Fowler White possibly misappropriating them, Farmer Jaffe recounted. The bankruptcy court granted the copying request with strict instructions that Fowler White was not to retain any copies. The court included an enforcement provision stating that if it was determined that the firm retained images or

in ongoing litigation between Epstein and former Farmer Jaffe partner Bradley J. Edwards, who represented several of Epstein's victims, showed that Fowler White retained a copy of confidential documents and that they had been passed along to Epstein's current counsel and to Epstein himself. But in a filing

urt. The Evidentiary Hearing Should Be Rescheduled i. Depositions The Show Cause Order permits Edwards to take the deposition of Jeffrey Epstein, Fowler White, and Link & Rockenbach with regard to "the allegations of federal civil contempt regarding the alleged discovery violations of the Agreed Ord

SET FOR AUGUST 23.24, 2018 Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards"), by and through undersigned counsel and pursuant to the Court's Order to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not Be Held in Contempt and Scheduling Evidentiary Show Cause Hearing, hereby files this Motion to Reschedule Show Cause

nation: "Perhaps I'm being a bit naive when I say that having served Mr. Epstein in their capacity as counsel, it's my respectful belief that they [Fowler White] owed an obligation to Mr. Epstein, if not this Court, to explain how and why they had access and kept these records in their possession in li

very, to Assess Sanctions and Costs, and for Other Appropriate Relief [DE 6353]. INTRODUCTION In their motion, the Victims sought sanctions against Fowler White and Epstein for illegally retaining copies of materials forbidden to be retained or copied by this Court's November 2010 order — including a disk o