Epstein Secrets

: Joichi Ito czi Subject: Re: $1M rain contract Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 15:17:05 +0000 concerned about fire sale On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Joichi Ito <1 > wrote: So maybe just say, "for the SEC who would be concerned about liquidity, it might be valued at zero even though it clearly isn't for other

: more complicated, value for book purposes value to a buyer. value to a buyer if cloudy weather day before. etc On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Joichi Ito -4 > wrote: Is the last sentence correct? When you take, for instance, a contract that pays out $1 million if it rains tomorrow, and put it into you

"jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Joichi Ito czi Subject: Re: $1M rain contract Date: Mon, 2

more money you had, the happier you would be, which Daniel Kahneman and Agnus Deaton argue is true up to about USD$75,000 a year in annual income. (Social Sciences - Psychological and Cognitive Sciences: Daniel Kahneman and Angus Deaton) Today, we have the technology and the computational power to create a system of accounts

From: Joichi Ito To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: $1M rain contract Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 14:18:00 +0000 Hmm... I was just trying to sketc

From: Joichi Ito To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subj

more money you had, the happier you would be, which Daniel Kahneman and Agnus Deaton argue is true up to about USD$75,o0o a year in annual income. (Social Sciences - Psychological and Cognitive Sciences: Daniel Kahneman and Angus Deaton) Today, we have the technology and the computational power to create a system of accounts

t: Re: $1M rain contract Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 14:37:27 +0000 think of it like insurance values, a life policy, On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Joichi Ito -4 > wrote: Hmm... I was just trying to sketch that it was complex. Do you think the last sentence is wrong? If something is nonnegotiable would you

"Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Joichi Ito czi Subject: Re: $1M rain contract Date: Mon, 2

more money you had, the happier you would be, which Daniel Kahneman and Agnus Deaton argue is true up to about USD$75,000 a year in annual income. (Social Sciences - Psychological and Cognitive Sciences: Daniel Kahneman and Angus Deaton) Today, we have the technology and the computational power to create a system of accounts

From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Joichi Ito Subject: Re: $1M rain contract Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 15:05:44 +0000 sec rules vs accounting rules vs gapp accounting vs tax accounting vs common se

"Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Joichi Ito Subject: Re: $1M rain contract Date: Mon, 25 Apr

more money you had, the happier you would be, which Daniel Kahneman and Agnus Deaton argue is true up to about USD$75,000 a year in annual income. (Social Sciences - Psychological and Cognitive Sciences: Daniel Kahneman and Angus Deaton) Today, we have the technology and the computational power to create a system of accounts