Epstein Secrets

: Joichi Ito czi Subject: Re: $1M rain contract Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 15:17:05 +0000 concerned about fire sale On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Joichi Ito <1 > wrote: So maybe just say, "for the SEC who would be concerned about liquidity, it might be valued at zero even though it clearly isn't for other

: more complicated, value for book purposes value to a buyer. value to a buyer if cloudy weather day before. etc On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Joichi Ito -4 > wrote: Is the last sentence correct? When you take, for instance, a contract that pays out $1 million if it rains tomorrow, and put it into you

"jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Joichi Ito czi Subject: Re: $1M rain contract Date: Mon, 2

e simply don't work. The simplest version of this model would mean that the more money you had, the happier you would be, which Daniel Kahneman and Agnus Deaton argue is true up to about USD$75,000 a year in annual income. (Social Sciences - Psychological and Cognitive Sciences: Daniel Kahneman and Angus De

From: Joichi Ito To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: $1M rain contract Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 14:18:00 +0000 Hmm... I was just trying to sketc

From: Joichi Ito To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subj

e simply don't work. The simplest version of this model would mean that the more money you had, the happier you would be, which Daniel Kahneman and Agnus Deaton argue is true up to about USD$75,o0o a year in annual income. (Social Sciences - Psychological and Cognitive Sciences: Daniel Kahneman and Angus Dea

t: Re: $1M rain contract Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 14:37:27 +0000 think of it like insurance values, a life policy, On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Joichi Ito -4 > wrote: Hmm... I was just trying to sketch that it was complex. Do you think the last sentence is wrong? If something is nonnegotiable would you

"Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Joichi Ito czi Subject: Re: $1M rain contract Date: Mon, 2

e simply don't work. The simplest version of this model would mean that the more money you had, the happier you would be, which Daniel Kahneman and Agnus Deaton argue is true up to about USD$75,000 a year in annual income. (Social Sciences - Psychological and Cognitive Sciences: Daniel Kahneman and Angus De

From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Joichi Ito Subject: Re: $1M rain contract Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 15:05:44 +0000 sec rules vs accounting rules vs gapp accounting vs tax accounting vs common se

"Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Joichi Ito Subject: Re: $1M rain contract Date: Mon, 25 Apr

e simply don't work. The simplest version of this model would mean that the more money you had, the happier you would be, which Daniel Kahneman and Agnus Deaton argue is true up to about USD$75,000 a year in annual income. (Social Sciences - Psychological and Cognitive Sciences: Daniel Kahneman and Angus De