Epstein Secrets

ments, because you can't just do it in a footnote and incorporate a trial pleading. That is where it stood. And then the Fourth District ruled on Fischer. At that point, I moved to dispense with oral argument, Epstein moved to file supplemental briefs -- excuse me -- a supplemental brief. And what h

51 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 litigation privilege applies under the rule announced in Fischer, because the element of absence of probable cause is not satisfied in Edwards' action for malicious prosecution." His next sentence, "The missing

absence of interdistrict conflict. And I will omit the citation. And she indicated that after the trial court ruling, the court held contrary in Fischer to constitute conflict that was ultimately resolved by the Florida Supreme Court. So I just wanted to make sure that was the opinion. I didn't re

I DATE TAKEN: Tuesday, October 3rd, 2017 TIME: 10:01 a.m. - 4:43 p.m. PLACE 205 N. Dixie Highway, Room 10C West Palm Beach, Florida BEFORE: Donald Hafele, Presiding Judge This cause came on to be heard at the time and place aforesaid, when and where the following proceedings were reported by: Sonja

. (A copy of Epstein's Answer Brief is attached as Exhibit B). While the appeal was pending at the Fourth District, that court issued an opinion in Fischer v. Debrincat, 169 So.3d 1204 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015), approved, 217 So.3d 68 (Fla. 2017). In Fischer, the court held that the litigation privilege could

e Fourth District, that court issued an opinion in Fischer v. Debrincat, 169 So.3d 1204 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015), approved, 217 So.3d 68 (Fla. 2017). In Fischer, the court held that the litigation privilege could not be applied to bar a claim for malicious prosecution or abuse of process. The court certified

27, 2014 TIME: 3:00 p.m. - 4:23 p.m. PLACE: Palm Beach County Courthouse 205 N. Dixie Highway Courtroom 9C West Palm Beach, FL 33401 BEFORE: Donald Hafele, Circuit Judge This cause came on to be heard at the time and place aforesaid, when and where the following proceedings were stenographically repo

aw.com 23 ACTIVE ~B4?Q3Qv7 CA/Arorfi~~P~Al~ BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3V27/2023 4:10:49 PM I purposes of the legislative scheme. Fischer v. Metcalf 543 So.2d 785 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (adding i the second and third factors; previously, courts considered solely the “class benefited” factor

ndants’ Motions to Dismiss were heard on June 3, 2020. While this “case is assigned to Division AG, which is currently presided over by the Honorable Donald Hafele ... ”, Chief Judge ofthe Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, [Hon. Krista Marx] presided over the June 3, 2020 hearing on the State Attorney and Clerk’s Moti

r she will not receive a fair trial, and is timely made, it should be granted." Borjas v. Brescher, 579 So. 2d 399, 400 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (citing Fischer v. Knuck, 497 So. 2d 240, 242 (Fla.1986)). A trial court, when presented with a motion to disqualify, must limit its review of the motion to a "bare

le. WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served, via electronic service, to all parties listed below, and upon Judge Donald Hafele, via hand delivery, this October 12, 2013. Tonja Haddad Coleman Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. Florida Bar No.: 176737 Tonja Haddad, PA 5315 SE 7th