Epstein Secrets

• NMOrr (Worn» avriblOrli a riper to the rem% Clem IAA?" DirAinnint at 201.)52• 1659 ce toUree t 800.35.9103. BODA.M. to 6.00 IT Monday Ilya* Foley, a en Ant ro to UYS ranee' *Yon Ix.. (lent Retie ore Deprive& PO. Bo. 766 Lhon Cly. ID 07087. • Al Mamas shall be darned complete al aura a not *

oaner vistaed Statomorollousaholione We may cento-delt aft reteed wont itasirmets mt. the tame xlins .n the same ethelcce, e.9. because they hem Werth, who abo mentan pre novo /flew...tun wtholher dents al the same erSeress I you prefer to mew M €du5 inemonts marled n apart. erneropos, you may at

One° oseome, erne larli a Mirth to tho ern% Glom lelabuit CthAvithent at 201.)52 • HA) tol/ree r 800.35.9103. SIDA.Le to 600 P M If Monday though Foley, a in ant rya 10 te5 Fruncol Strycth 'x.. (lent Rene we Department. PO. Bo. 766 Iron CU 11107081, • Al statements shall be deemed corn:tete sod au

8,053 68 -13,486.12 -13,486.12 8.75 8.75 $36,522.63 $36.52243 Dividend and interest income earned Re Outposts c( lbs statement. temblity of Werth and clecttoci krterne has been cluenrenel (Km a us to ItP:enn9 perspective Based tepOo the residence of the Account hOrdel. (Cream? !pt. or pecestxt

Onerci cutOtivor aniplardi a Myrrh to the ern% Client Malan. Dinterellent a 201.)52 • 169) atolls r 800.35.9103, PCO A.M. to 600 IT Monday though Foley, a rn em all0 285 hunt Of *Kt, Ix.. (lent Rile ore Department. PO. Bo. 766then CU 1602083. • Al statements shall be deemed complete sal mane it n

000 614,019.77 -66,963.45 -1,318,998.89 5.10 5.029.45 $5.10 $5.10 Dividend and interest income earned for Oup0SeS 04 Po stserent tegabity a Werth and dikkncl income has been clekm-snecl !ken a vs 140, PPM PR ohscecioe Med Lacon the reliance of the </mon, hadt1 Mount we, a pnaaxt we, some Waal

ttorney was about to present to a grand jury infor- mation relating to petitioners' tax lia- bility derived from them. Upon this application, Judge Foley, sitting in Albany, signed an ex parte order dated February 26. 1960, requiring the United States attorney to show cause on the judge's next sche

suit The principal claims are for injunctive and de- claratory relief; such equitable relief is particularly suited for group representa- tion. See Werth, 422 U.S. at 516, 96 S.Ct. at 2213. Thus, we conclude that the orga- nizations have standing. IV 17, 8) Although a case may not be moot, a plaint