Epstein Secrets

> wrote: I wouldn't take the term "mechanism" too literally. It refers to whatever is taking place in the brain. For some, as most of those in the Nowak group, it means neural nets. For Gallistel, it's processes internal to the cell. Useful to look at these matters in terms of Marr's three levels: co

to account for what they are trying to show, or even to understand the issue. There are, I think, some notable exceptions, like the recent work of Charles Yang, one of Bob Berwick's students. From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2015 8:22 AM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re:

rote: I wouldn't take the term =80 mechanism" too literally. It refers to whatever is taki=g place in the brain. For some, as most of those in the Nowak group, it means neural nets. =For Gallistel, it's processes internal to the cell. Useful t= look at these matters in terms of Marr's three levels: c

to "recount for what they are trying to show, or even to understand the issue. There are, I think, some notable exceptions, like the recent work of Charles Yang, one of Bob Berwick's student=. From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]=m] Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2015 8:22 AM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: R

=rote: I wouldn't take the term =80 mechanism" too literally. It refers to whatever is taki=g place in the brain. For some, as most of those in the Nowak group, it means neural nets. =For Gallistel, it's processes internal to the cell. Useful t= look at these matters in terms of Marr's three levels: c

e to =ccount for what they are trying to show, or even to understand the issue. There are, I think, some notable exceptions, like the recent work of Charles Yang, one of Bob Berwick's student=. From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]=m] Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2015 8:22 AM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: R