Epstein Secrets

on that it should be acted upon; and (5) that the plaintiff acted ("8] upon it to his damage."' Financial Trust Co., 268 F. Supp.2d at 575 (quoting Shapiro v. UJB Fin. Corp., 964 F.2d 272, 284 (3d Cir. 1992)). The defendants base their argument that plaintiffs have failed to state a claim upon which r

that defendants were acting in plaintiffs' best interests. For example, it is alleged that in conversations between April 29, 1999 and May 2, 1999, Dayle Davison, a Vice President of Citibank in the Private Banking Division, called Epstein to introduce him to an "exceptional investment opportunity." (Compl. P

lsity by the person to whom it was made; (4) the intention that it should be acted upon; and (5) that the plaintiff acted upon it to his damage." Shapiro I UJB Fin. Corp., 964 F.2d 272, 284 (3d Cir.1992). Although the rule does not require a recitation of "every material detail" of the alleged fraud

rder, the proceedings should be stayed pending the adjudication of the first-filed action. (sac) (Entered: 10/16/2002) 10/09/2002 13 AFFIDAVIT of Dayle Davison by Citibank, N.A. in opposition to [7-1] motion for an order, pun. to Rules 1, 12 and 13(a) of the FRCP, dismissing the Complaint, [7-2] motion for

falsity by the person to whom it was made; (4) the intention that it should be acted upon; and (5) that the plaintiff acted upon it to his damage." Shapiro v. UJB Fin. Corp., 964 F.2d 272, 284 (3d Cir. 1992). Although the rule does not require a recitation of EFTA01726537 Financial Trust Co., Inc. v.

(Count V). The plaintiffs seek rescission of the promissory note and punitive damages (Counts VI and VII). (Am. Compl. III 45-68.) In April 1999, Dayle Davison ["Davison"], Vice President of Citibank in New York and Epstein's private banker, and other Citibank employees telephoned Epstein while he was in t