Epstein Secrets

iller v. City of New York, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4285 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 19, 2007) 8 Seife v. Dep't of State, 366 F. Supp. 3d 592 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) 8 Shapiro v. Dep't ofJustice, 249 F. Supp. 3d 502 (D.D.C. 2017) 10 United States v. Martoma, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182959 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) 4, 5 United Sta

e documents appear to be largely factual in nature and therefore are not subject to a blanket withholding under Exemption 5. (Pl.'s Br., at 19); see Grand Central P 'ship, Inc. v. Cuomo, 166 F.3d 473, 482 (2d Cir. 1999) ("Purely factual material not reflecting the agency's deliberative process is not protected.")

iller v. City of New York, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4285 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 19, 2007) 8 Seife v. Dep't of State, 366 F. Supp. 3d 592 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) 8 Shapiro v. Dep't ofJustice, 249 F. Supp. 3d 502 (D.D.C. 2017) 10 United States v. Martoma, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182959 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) 4, 5 United Sta

e documents appear to be largely factual in nature and therefore are not subject to a blanket withholding under Exemption 5. (Pl.'s Br., at 19); see Grand Central P 'ship, Inc. v. Cuomo, 166 F.3d 473, 482 (2d Cir. 1999) ("Purely factual material not reflecting the agency's deliberative process is not protected.")

iller v. City of New York, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4285 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 19, 2007) 8 Seife v. Dep't of State, 366 F. Supp. 3d 592 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) 8 Shapiro v. Dep't ofJustice, 249 F. Supp. 3d 502 (D.D.C. 2017) 10 United States v. Martoma, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182959 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) 4, 5 United Sta

e documents appear to be largely factual in nature and therefore are not subject to a blanket withholding under Exemption 5. (Pl.'s Br., at 19); see Grand Central P 'ship, Inc. v. Cuomo, 166 F.3d 473, 482 (2d Cir. 1999) ("Purely factual material not reflecting the agency's deliberative process is not protected.")