Epstein Secrets

iller v. City of New York, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4285 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 19, 2007) 8 Seife v. Dep't of State, 366 F. Supp. 3d 592 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) 8 Shapiro v. Dep't ofJustice, 249 F. Supp. 3d 502 (D.D.C. 2017) 10 United States v. Martoma, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182959 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) 4, 5 United Sta

ption 5, the deliberative process privilege "does not operate indiscriminately to shield all decision-making by public officials." N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Def., 499 F. Supp. 2d 501, 514 (S.D.N.Y. 2007). Moreover, the Government's Exemption 5 withholdings cannot survive because BOP has failed to meet

cords qualify as "compiled for law enforcement purposes" if they "relate to anything that can fairly be characterized as an enforcement proceeding." Shapiro v. U.S. Dep't ofJustice, 37 F. Supp. 3d 7, 29 (D.D.C. 2014) (quotation marks omitted). The Tenth Circuit has adopted a "per se rule" that "for an a

2(bX7XC). Under Exemption 7(C), a court again "balance[s] the public interest in disclosure against the [privacy] interest." Associated Press v. US. Dep't of Defense,554 F.3d 274, 284 (2d Cir. 2009). In this analysis, "[t]here is only one relevant public interest, that of opening agency action to the li

iller v. City of New York, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4285 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 19, 2007) 8 Seife v. Dep't of State, 366 F. Supp. 3d 592 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) 8 Shapiro v. Dep't ofJustice, 249 F. Supp. 3d 502 (D.D.C. 2017) 10 United States v. Martoma, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182959 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) 4, 5 United Sta

ption 5, the deliberative process privilege "does not operate indiscriminately to shield all decision-making by public officials." N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Def., 499 F. Supp. 2d 501, 514 (S.D.N.Y. 2007). Moreover, the Government's Exemption 5 withholdings cannot survive because BOP has failed to meet

iller v. City of New York, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4285 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 19, 2007) 8 Seife v. Dep't of State, 366 F. Supp. 3d 592 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) 8 Shapiro v. Dep't ofJustice, 249 F. Supp. 3d 502 (D.D.C. 2017) 10 United States v. Martoma, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182959 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) 4, 5 United Sta

ption 5, the deliberative process privilege "does not operate indiscriminately to shield all decision-making by public officials." N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Def., 499 F. Supp. 2d 501, 514 (S.D.N.Y. 2007). Moreover, the Government's Exemption 5 withholdings cannot survive because BOP has failed to meet