Epstein Secrets

ey Brooks, Nicholas Carr, George Church, Richard Dawkins, Daniel C. Dennett, Jared Diamond, George Dyson,

rectly to publishers in the global market place. Clients include Chris Anderson (Wired), Stewart Brand, Rodney Brooks, Nicholas Carr, George Church, Richard Dawkins, Daniel C. Dennett, Jared Diamond, George Dyson, Gerald Edelman, Michael Gazzaniga, Murray Gell- Mann, Neil Gershenfeld, Daniel Gilbert, Daniel Golem

rabasi, Physicist, Computer Scientist, Notre Dame Simon Baron-Cohen, Neuroscientist, Cambridge University Gregory Bateson (Estate), Anthropologist Mary Catherine Bateson, Anthropologist, George Mason Univeristy Yochai Benkler, Internet Legal Expert, Harvard Benjamin Bergen, Cognitive Scientist, UC, San Diego Paul B

From: John Brockman <-> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 6:05 PM To: Craig Venter; George Church; Nassim Nicholas Taleb; Jared Diamond; Richard Dawkins; Murray Gell-Mann; Martin Rees; Philip Campbell; Alun Anderson; Nathan Myhrvold; Paul Allen; Charles Simonyi; Bill Gates; Ginevra Elkann; Craig Mund

h; Nassim Nicholas Taleb; Jared Diamond; Richard Dawkins; Murray Gell-Mann; Martin Rees; Philip Campbell;

off, Michael Shermer, David Christian, Juan =nriquez, Peter Woit, Nicholas Humphrey, Charles Seife, Aubrey De Grey, =cott Atran, Clifford Pickover, Mary Catherine Bateson, Colin Tudge, =oger Schank, Steven Pinker, Howard Gardner, Daniel C. Dennett We worry because we are built to anticipate the future. Nothing can st

been critiqued by evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins, myself, and others. We can discuss “should” if f

oted that “science and religion occupy two separate realms.” This 166 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016386 division has been critiqued by evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins, myself, and others. We can discuss “should” if framed as “we should do X in order to achieve Y.” Which Y should be a high priority is not necessaril

ut, harmonizing those sensory, scintillating signals. Mind happens well outside the limits of the cranium (and its simulacrum, the “motherboard”). In Mary Catherine Bateson’s paraphrase of her father Gregory’s second-order cybernetics, mind is material “not necessarily defined by a boundary such as an envelope of skin.”°

been critiqued by evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins, myself, and others. We can discuss “should” if f

oted that “science and religion occupy two separate realms.” This 166 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016969 division has been critiqued by evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins, myself, and others. We can discuss “should” if framed as “we should do X in order to achieve Y.” Which Y should be a high priority is not necessaril

ut, harmonizing those sensory, scintillating signals. Mind happens well outside the limits of the cranium (and its simulacrum, the “motherboard”). In Mary Catherine Bateson’s paraphrase of her father Gregory’s second-order cybernetics, mind is material “not necessarily defined by a boundary such as an envelope of skin.”°