Epstein Secrets

biological systems. Biological Cybernetics, 87, 392-403,2002. Den87. D. Dennett. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987. Den91. Daniel Dennett. Consciousness Explained. Back Bay, 1991. DC05. Hugo De Cans. The Artifact War. ETC, 2005. DOP08. Wlodzislaw Duch, Richard Oentaryo, and Michel P

stage theory: a Piagetian revision. Human Development, 22:89-112, 1978. Cib79. J. J. Gibson. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979. CICH08. B. Goertzel, M. Ikle, I. Goertzel, and A. Heljalcka. Probabilistic Logic Networks. Springer, 2008. Ci182. Carol Cilligan. In a Dif

ic plasticity in biological systems. Biological Cybernetics, 87, 392-403, 2002. D. Dennett. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987. Daniel Dennett. Consciousness Explained. Back Bay, 1991. Hugo De Garis. The Artilect War. ETC, 2005. Wlodzislaw Duch, Richard Oentaryo, and Michel Pasquier. Cogni

l stage theory: a Piagetian revision. Human Development, 22:89-112, 1978. Gib79. J. J. Gibson. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979. GIGHO8. B. Goertzel, M. Ikle, I. Goertzel, and A. Heljakka. Probabilistic Logic Networks. Springer, 2008. Gil82. Carol Gilligan. In a Differ

cience seem to go hand in hand; each field can propel the other. 132 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016935 Many evolutionary scientists, and such philosophers as Daniel Dennett, have pointed out that the human brain is the result of billions of years of evolution.*°> Human intelligence is not the special characteristic we th

ish “analog” versus “digital.” Digital signal encoding was entirely compatible with cybernetic thinking—in 33 The Human Use of Human Beings (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1954), p. 17-18. 125 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016928 fact, enabling to it. What was constraining to cybernetics was the presumption of an analogy of struc

cience seem to go hand in hand; each field can propel the other. 132 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016352 Many evolutionary scientists, and such philosophers as Daniel Dennett, have pointed out that the human brain is the result of billions of years of evolution.*°> Human intelligence is not the special characteristic we th

ish “analog” versus “digital.” Digital signal encoding was entirely compatible with cybernetic thinking—in 33 The Human Use of Human Beings (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1954), p. 17-18. 125 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016345 fact, enabling to it. What was constraining to cybernetics was the presumption of an analogy of struc