Epstein Secrets

From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Noam Chomsky < Subject: Re: Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2015 20:13:45 +0000 ill work on the 16th On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Noam Chomsky < wrote: Busy week, lots

m: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Noam Chomsky < Subject: Re: Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2015 20:13:45

(which, he didn't realize, just uses standard Romance grammar with very minor changes)? Or better, why don't we all talk predicate calculus? Frege, Tarski, and others also thought that human language wasn't worth studying. One can even construct paradoxes in it. Quite a departure from a rich tradition

From: Noam Chomsky Sent: Sunday, September 6, 2015 8:12 PM To: effre E. Cc: Subject: RE: Busy week, lots of talks. Best time for us would be the 16th. Have a ta

From: Noam Chomsky Sent: Sunday, September 6, 2015 8:12 PM To: e

(which, he didn't realize, just uses standard Romance grammar with very minor changes)? Or better, why don't we all talk predicate calculus? Frege, Tarski, and others also thought that human language wasn't worth studying. One can even construct paradoxes in it. Quite a departure from a rich tradition

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, September 6, 2015 8:14 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: ill work on the 16th <=r> On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Noam Chomsky =span dir="ltr">< wrote: Busy week, lots of talks. Best =i

nt: Sunday, September 6, 2015 8:14 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: ill work on the 16th <=r> On Su

h, he didn =80 t realize, just uses standard Romance grammar with very minor changes=? Or better, why don't we all talk predicate calculus? Frege, Tarski, and others also thought that human language wasn't w=rth studying. One can even construct paradoxes in it. Quite a depart=re from a rich tradition