Epstein Secrets

From: Noam Chomsky To: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Re: Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 17:30:27 +0000 That makes sense. At some level, at least the cell

From: Noam Chomsky To: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> Subject

ed these topics. In fact, his famous three levels adapted a model from generative grammar. But there was always the fundamental problem I mentioned. Vision is an input system, crafting coherent images from lines, points of light, etc. Language is used for that purpose too, but it's not what language is

From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Re: Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 16:11:53 +0000 understood, however i am working down the line , i dont care what creates the signal . light

m: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Re: Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 16:11:53

ed these topics. In fact, his famous three levels adapted a model from generative grammar. But there was always the fundamental problem I mentioned. Vision is an input system, crafting coherent images from lines, points of light, etc. Language is used for that purpose too, but it's not what language is

From: Noam Chomsky To: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Re: Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 17:37:14 +0000 Very interesting topics. Would like to hear more f

From: Noam Chomsky To: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> Subject

ed these topics. In fact, his famous three levels adapted a model from generative grammar. But there was always the fundamental problem I mentioned. Vision is an input system, crafting coherent images from lines, points of light, etc. Language is used for that purpose too, but it's not what language is

From: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Re: Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 16:27:40 +0000 thought you might be interested in a new version of the percentage agreement between stalin

m: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Re: Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 16:27:40

ed these topics. In fact, his famous three levels adapted a model from generative grammar. But there was always the fundamental problem I mentioned. Vision is an input system, crafting coherent images from lines, points of light, etc. Language is used for that purpose too, but it's not what language is

From: "Noam Chomsky" To: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> Subject: RE: ALT MIN , not in literatue Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:22:21 +0000 Off for a couple of days,

From: "Noam Chomsky" To: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> Subje

oing somewhere , but as it is created out of thin air by fractional reserve banking, . its difficult to find equilibrium. the system is not closed. Vision is an input system yes, but its down the line effect is to map one mindbrain state to another, shape changing . I think of the I language as a shape

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 4:12 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Re: understood, however i am working down the line , i dont care what creates the signal . ligh= lines regularites, etc. sound smell

: Thursday, December 24, 2015 4:12 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Re: understood, however i am work

ed these topics. In fact, his famous three levels ad=pted a model from generative grammar. But there was always the funda=ental problem I mentioned. Vision is an input system, crafting coher=nt images from lines, points of light, etc. Language is used for that purpose too, but it's not what language is

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 4:28 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Re: thought you might be interested in a new version of the pe=centage agreement between stalin and churchill. Saudi an= Iran doing

: Thursday, December 24, 2015 4:28 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Re: thought you might be interest

ed these topics. In fact, his famous three levels ad=pted a model from generative grammar. But there was always the funda=ental problem I mentioned. Vision is an input system, crafting coher=nt images from lines, points of light, etc. Language is used for that purpose too, but it's not what language is

From: Noam Chomsky < Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 5:37 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: RE: Re: Very interesting topics. Would like to hear more from you about th

From: Noam Chomsky < Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 5:37 PM To

ed these topics. In fact, his famous three levels adapted a model from generative grammar. But there was always the fundamental problem I mentioned. Vision is an input system, crafting coherent images from lines, points of light, etc. Language is used for that purpose too, but it's not what language is

From: Noam Chomsky Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 5:30 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: RE: Re: That makes sense. At some level, at least the cellular level, there

From: Noam Chomsky Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 5:30 PM To:

ed these topics. In fact, his famous three levels adapted a model from generative grammar. But there was always the fundamental problem I mentioned. Vision is an input system, crafting coherent images from lines, points of light, etc. Language is used for that purpose too, but it's not what language is

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 3:48 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Vision rules needed to craft coherent image . Edges? & uo=; Fa ehtabowtit." Two edges crafted by software =br>On Thursday, December

: Thursday, December 24, 2015 3:48 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Vision rules needed to craft cohe

ng effect is much longer. However, there are fundamental differ=nces between vision and language. Can send you a recent paper about it if you like. Vision is an input system. Language isn=E2 t. It's an internal capacity, a system of knowledge,=which is used to process input and also to produce thoughts