Epstein Secrets

From: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Re: Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 02:57:29 +0000 This all needs exposition. sorry. the computer model for living systems has not led to many

m: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Re: Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 02:57:29

n reduces to determinacy and randomness (i.e., programmable). I think it may have come up in the Krauss discussion. I also discussed it again in my Dewey lectures in the J. of Philosophy in December 2013. I don't frankly see how the Schrodinger analogy helps in this case. To clarify, the people I men

From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Re: Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 11:09:47 +0000 Attachments: structre-serch-entropy-july5-2012.pdf Inline-Images: jumpnew_hl-ljpg thats ch

m: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Re: Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 11:09:47

n reduces to determinacy and randomness (i.e., programmable). I think it may have come up in the Krauss discussion. I also discussed it again in my Dewey lectures in the J. of Philosophy in December 2013. I don't frankly see how the Schrodinger analogy helps in this case. To clarify, the people I men

From: Noam Chomsky < Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 2:18 AM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: RE: Re: > It's absolutely true that for study of choice of action, the computer

From: Noam Chomsky < Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 2:18 AM To: Jef

n reduces to determinacy and randomness (i.e., programmable). I think it may have come up in the Krauss discussion. I also discussed it again in my Dewey lectures in the J. of Philosophy in December 2013. I don't frankly see how the Schrodinger analogy helps in this case. To clarify, the people I men

From: Noam Chomsky < Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 1:29 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: RE: Re: Sorry, but I don't follow. Insect navigation is a study of a living syst

From: Noam Chomsky < Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 1:29 PM To: Jef

on reduces to determinacy and randomness (i.e., programmable). I think it may have come up in the Krauss discussion. I also discussed it again in my Dewey lectures in the J. of Philosophy in December 2013. I don't frankly see how the Schrodinger analogy helps in this case. To clarify, the people I men

From: Noam Chomsky <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 4:49 AM To: jeffrey E. Subject: RE: Re: It's quite true that computer modelling of living syste

From: Noam Chomsky <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2015

n reduces to determinacy and randomness (i.e., programmable). I think it may have come up in the Krauss discussion. I also discussed it again in my Dewey lectures in the J. of Philosophy in December 2013. I don't frankly see how the Schrodinger analogy helps in this case. To clarify, the people I men

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 1:52 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Re: As Always everything written by me to you should be seen alongside a smile and twinkle . expressing my enjoyment you engage in

Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 1:52 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Re: As Always everything written

on red=ces to determinacy and randomness (i.e., programmable). I think it m=y have come up in the Krauss discussion. I also discussed it again in my Dewey lectures in the J. of Philosophy in December 2013. I don't frankly see how the S=hrodinger analogy helps in this case. To clarify, the people I men

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 11:10 AM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Re: thats cheating . . Is the study of ho= it dances really a study of the living systen? or is merely t=e sensory motor display in

Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 11:10 AM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Re: thats cheating . . Is the stu

n red=ces to determinacy and randomness (i.e., programmable). I think it m=y have come up in the Krauss discussion. I also discussed it again in my Dewey lectures in the J. of Philosophy in December 2013. I don't frankly see how the S=hrodinger analogy helps in this case. To clarify, the people I men

From: Noam Chomsky Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 4:35 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: RE: Re: Found a few minutes to start plowing through masses of mail. Much too b

From: Noam Chomsky Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 4:35 PM To: Je

on reduces to determinacy and randomness (i.e., programmable). I think it may have come up in the Krauss discussion. I also discussed it again in my Dewey lectures in the J. of Philosophy in December 2013. I don't frankly see how the Schrodinger analogy helps in this case. To clarify, the people I men